View source for Howling:Problems with T:SPOIL

{{forumheader|The Howling}}{{cat|contains spoilers}}
<!-- Please put your content under this line.  Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes: ~~~~ -->
[[File:Problems with spoilers.jpg|thumb|Screenshot of [[Special:WikiActivity]].]]
Right, so the example I have is from today and involves ''[[The Third Doctor Adventures: Volume Six]]''.

The following would be revealed if you had read [[Special:WikiActivity]] at this time:
* The very fact that a sixth volume of ''[[The Third Doctor Adventures (audio series)|The Third Doctor Adventures]]'' is being released.
* The [[Third Doctor]] and [[Jo Grant]] is the [[TARDIS team]] for this anthology.
* [[Winston Churchill]] as played by [[Ian McNeice]] is featured in the anthology.
* The [[Dalek]]s are featured in this anthology.
* The anthology is being released in 2020.
* There are two stories in the anthology.
** It is just about legible that the two stories are called ''Poison of the Daleks'' and ''Operation: Hellfire''.
* Although not legible on this example, the cover also states the four main cast members that are featured.

As per [[Tardis:Spoiler policy]], it is forbidden to even acknowledge the fact that there will be another volume of this series in the infobox for ''[[The Third Doctor Adventures: Volume Five]]''. It is also against policy to state spoilers in words in edit summaries, even though edits like this contain spoilers in edit summaries. Even if nothing is written in the edit summary for future edits, it would be a violation as the page edited (and therefore acknowledgment of its existence) would show up in Special:WikiActivity.

Is the solution to this a relaxation of our spoiler policy or something else?