Information for "User talk:Skittles the hog/Archive 6"
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
| Display title | User talk:Skittles the hog/Archive 6 |
| Default sort key | Skittles the hog/Archive 6 |
| Page length (in bytes) | 57,527 |
| Namespace | User_talk |
| Page ID | 75861 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
| Number of subpages of this page | 0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects) |
| Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
View the protection log for this page.
| Page creator | Skittles the hog (talk | contribs) |
| Date of page creation | 18:54, 29 July 2011 |
| Latest editor | Shambala108 (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 01:22, 10 September 2019 |
| Total number of edits | 14 |
| Total number of distinct authors | 3 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 0 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
| Hidden category (1) | This page is a member of a hidden category:
|
| Transcluded templates (9) | Templates used on this page:
|
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | To answer questions you left yesterday, I think Dalekcaan14 is probably not expressing himself fully. Whatever is at the core of what he's trying to convey probably is true, because he's studied the scene too many times for him to be just making it up. That's why he needs to start a discussion on the page. As it was last worded in the history, I'm obviously with you and Revan: it doesn't make much sense. But, again, he made a good faith edit that, in its current wording, is incorrect. That's not vandalism. |
Information from
Extension:WikiSEO
