| Display title | Talk:The Grinch |
| Default sort key | The Grinch |
| Page length (in bytes) | 3,502 |
| Namespace | Talk |
| Page ID | 294630 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 1 |
| Number of subpages of this page | 0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects) |
| Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Page creator | Bongolium500 (talk | contribs) |
| Date of page creation | 19:01, 5 May 2021 |
| Latest editor | Bongolium500 (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 16:19, 6 September 2023 |
| Total number of edits | 11 |
| Total number of distinct authors | 4 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 0 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
| Transcluded templates (4) | Templates used on this page:
|
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | I would like to voice my support of the renaming of this article from Grinch to The Grinch. According to the page, the character was referred to as The Grinch. This forms the lead and so The Grinch is boldened. It makes sense to me that the name of the article should follow suit. Moreover, the character is referred to as The Grinch in non-DWU stories, such as How The Grinch Stole Christmas!. However, the second reference is Krampus being referred to as a "regular Grinch". To me, this feels like Grinch wasn't being used in the sense of the character but rather as a concept. I feel that there should be both a page on the character of The Grinch and a page on the concept of being a grinch. Bongo50 (aka Bongolium500) ☎ 19:00, 5 May 2021 (UTC) |
