Information for "Forum:Classic and New"
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
| Display title | Forum:Classic and New |
| Default sort key | Classic and New |
| Page length (in bytes) | 2,710 |
| Namespace | Forum |
| Page ID | 368413 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
| Number of subpages of this page | 0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects) |
| Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
View the protection log for this page.
| Page creator | MrThermomanPreacher (talk | contribs) |
| Date of page creation | 00:56, 26 November 2023 |
| Latest editor | MrThermomanPreacher (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 02:08, 16 May 2024 |
| Total number of edits | 6 |
| Total number of distinct authors | 4 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 0 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
| Transcluded template (1) | Template used on this page:
|
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | This is an idea I've had for a while which I think is particularly relevant now. Basically, I feel we could use a page which covers the divide between "Classic Who" and "New Who" and perhaps the "New New Who" as well. I see it as being like the page for canon in that it would collect references from official sources and authors. It could cover anything from the existence of separate classic and new series BBC websites, to Big Finish Productions' expansion to post-2005 content (as highlighted in Classic Doctors, New Monsters), their being listed as separate titles on platforms such as the new Whoniverse and even the "No classics? No 50th!!" gag from The Five(ish) Doctors Reboot. MrThermomanPreacher ☎ 00:56, 26 November 2023 (UTC) |
Information from
Extension:WikiSEO
