Information for "Forum:Coverage/validity: In the Domain of the Daleks"
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
| Display title | Forum:Coverage/validity: In the Domain of the Daleks |
| Default sort key | Coverage/validity: In the Domain of the Daleks |
| Page length (in bytes) | 6,254 |
| Namespace | Forum |
| Page ID | 361976 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
| Number of subpages of this page | 0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects) |
| Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
View the protection log for this page.
| Page creator | Cgl1999 (talk | contribs) |
| Date of page creation | 20:17, 17 September 2023 |
| Latest editor | OttselSpy25 (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 22:36, 28 February 2024 |
| Total number of edits | 13 |
| Total number of distinct authors | 8 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 0 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
| Transcluded template (1) | Template used on this page:
|
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | I've got something a little unusual that I think might be eligible for coverage by this wiki. A playset produced by Bluebird Toys in 1997 called In the Domain of the Daleks. The playset appears to be trying to tell a specific story, so I think it should be a source on this wiki. The problem is, I'm not exactly sure if it qualifies as a work of fiction. This might be a case of something passing the old version of Rule 1, but not the current version of it. If this is the case, I think coverage as invalid might be an option, as this wiki covers several things that aren't quite works of fiction as invalid. Cgl1999 ☎ 20:17, 17 September 2023 (UTC) |
Information from
Extension:WikiSEO
