Information for "Forum:T:NAVBOX"
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Display title | T:NAVBOX |
Default sort key | T:NAVBOX |
Page length (in bytes) | 25,416 |
Namespace | Forum |
Page ID | 332635 |
Page content language | en - English |
Page content model | wikitext |
Indexing by robots | Allowed |
Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
Number of subpages of this page | 0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects) |
Edit | Allow only administrators (infinite) |
Move | Allow only administrators (infinite) |
View the protection log for this page.
Page creator | Scrooge MacDuck (talk | contribs) |
Date of page creation | 19:16, 25 April 2023 |
Latest editor | SV7 (talk | contribs) |
Date of latest edit | 16:13, 21 October 2024 |
Total number of edits | 32 |
Total number of distinct authors | 9 |
Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 2 |
Recent number of distinct authors | 1 |
Transcluded templates (4) | Templates used on this page:
|
Description | Content |
Article description: (description ) This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | Alright, so over the past few years we've run into a few problems with navbox policies, or, really, the lack thereof. It's nothing particularly major, but I'd rather that we figure something out before massive problems are created, rather than after. I tried to look into other wikis to see if they had policies we could base our rules off of - my understanding is that much of our framework is derived from Memory Alpha's, iirc. All of the big wikis didn't seem to have any concrete policies, nor did the Mario wiki, Zelda, bulbapedia or tfwiki. (I'm just going to speculate here, but I think the reason other large wikis don't have the issue is the more simplified rights situations, combined with the relatively simple levels of fictionality each of them have to deal with in comparison to us.) |
Information from
Extension:WikiSEO