Information for "Forum:Validity: The Airzone Solution"
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
| Display title | Forum:Validity: The Airzone Solution |
| Default sort key | Validity: The Airzone Solution |
| Page length (in bytes) | 15,560 |
| Namespace | Forum |
| Page ID | 358084 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
| Number of subpages of this page | 0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects) |
| Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
View the protection log for this page.
| Page creator | Cgl1999 (talk | contribs) |
| Date of page creation | 05:44, 6 August 2023 |
| Latest editor | Scrooge MacDuck (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 14:35, 25 August 2024 |
| Total number of edits | 25 |
| Total number of distinct authors | 7 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 0 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
| Transcluded templates (5) | Templates used on this page:
|
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | Now that my validity proposal has concluded has concluded, I have another BBV Rule 4 by proxy case that I would like to discuss. This one deals with The Airzone Solution, which I think could have a case for R4bp because the Airzone Corporation is mentioned in Jay Eales' subsection of Burning with Optimism's Flames' Contributors section, which is treated as a valid source by this wiki. Now, I'm aware that the original Airzone Solution film isn't covered on this wiki do to having no official connection to the DWU, however, the novelization of it is, albeit as an invalid source, due to containing officially licensed references to DWU elements. I think it would make sense to validate the novelization of TAZ by R4bp because of this reference. Cgl1999 ☎ 05:44, 6 August 2023 (UTC) |
Information from
Extension:WikiSEO
