Information for "Talk:List of companions/Archive 2"
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
| Display title | Talk:List of companions/Archive 2 |
| Default sort key | List of companions/Archive 2 |
| Page length (in bytes) | 2,601 |
| Namespace | Talk |
| Page ID | 93977 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
| Number of subpages of this page | 0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects) |
| Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
View the protection log for this page.
| Page creator | Mini-mitch (talk | contribs) |
| Date of page creation | 16:51, 5 February 2012 |
| Latest editor | CzechBot (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 03:23, 28 August 2012 |
| Total number of edits | 2 |
| Total number of distinct authors | 2 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 0 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
| Transcluded templates (6) | Templates used on this page:
|
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | Really? How can one off characters be considered companions, even disputed? This is understandable for characters such as Astrid and Adelaide, who (though I personally don't consider them companions) did fill a companion role in episodes where a regular companion is absent. But saying that Nasreen and Craig could be "companions" is ridiculous! We can't say that every one of the Doctor's many aquaintances is a companion. Otherwise we'd be left with a massive list. TemporalSpleen 21:27, February 25, 2011 (UTC) |
Information from
Extension:WikiSEO
