Information for "Talk:The Doctor/Archive 3"
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Display title | Talk:The Doctor/Archive 3 |
Default sort key | The Doctor/Archive 3 |
Page length (in bytes) | 28,658 |
Namespace | Talk |
Page ID | 112301 |
Page content language | en - English |
Page content model | wikitext |
Indexing by robots | Allowed |
Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
Number of subpages of this page | 0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects) |
Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
View the protection log for this page.
Page creator | CzechOut (talk | contribs) |
Date of page creation | 17:40, 3 September 2012 |
Latest editor | CzechBot (talk | contribs) |
Date of latest edit | 01:56, 19 September 2012 |
Total number of edits | 2 |
Total number of distinct authors | 2 |
Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 0 |
Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Transcluded templates (7) | Templates used on this page:
|
Description | Content |
Article description: (description ) This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | There seems to be no consistency on whether we use promotional pictures or screencaps for the individual Doctor articles, and for the collage on this page. For example, First Doctor has a promo image, Seventh Doctor has a screencap, and Tenth Doctor has something which looks like a screencap but I'm pretty sure is actually a high-quality image from the Doctor Who website and not technically a capture from an episode. We're going through Eleventh Doctor images like a bucket of popcorn - why do we really need one from the latest story he was in? It's not even a particularly good picture. Do we actually have a policy on this sort of thing?--The Traveller 11:38, January 22, 2011 (UTC) |
Information from
Extension:WikiSEO