Information for "User:Cousin Ettolrhc/Sandbox/Coverage policy"
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Display title | User:Cousin Ettolrhc/Sandbox/Coverage policy |
Default sort key | Cousin Ettolrhc/Sandbox/Coverage policy |
Page length (in bytes) | 3,410 |
Namespace | User |
Page ID | 372635 |
Page content language | en - English |
Page content model | wikitext |
User ID | 52237165 |
Indexing by robots | Allowed |
Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
Number of subpages of this page | 0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects) |
Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
View the protection log for this page.
Page creator | Cousin Ettolrhc (talk | contribs) |
Date of page creation | 09:13, 20 January 2024 |
Latest editor | Cousin Ettolrhc (talk | contribs) |
Date of latest edit | 09:13, 20 January 2024 |
Total number of edits | 1 |
Total number of distinct authors | 1 |
Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 0 |
Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Hidden category (1) | This page is a member of a hidden category:
|
Transcluded templates (19) | Templates used on this page:
|
Description | Content |
Article description: (description ) This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | As a simple result of the fact that it is fictive content which is cited on in-universe articles, the majority of sources we cover are complete works of fiction.
However, there are some cases where the in-universe framing device is shaky but still present, such as The Encyclopedia which cites its sources, but otherwise maintains an in-universe perspective [source needed]. Things like this are completely fine because Target novelisations have always contained references to past novelisations in footnotes, and deeming them "not complete works of fiction" would be absurd. |
Information from
Extension:WikiSEO