Information for "User:Epsilon/Opening posts/Non-narrative fiction"
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
| Display title | User:Epsilon/Opening posts/Non-narrative fiction |
| Default sort key | Epsilon/Opening posts/Non-narrative fiction |
| Page length (in bytes) | 23,028 |
| Namespace | User |
| Page ID | 323524 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| User ID | 39988495 |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 2 |
| Number of subpages of this page | 0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects) |
| Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
View the protection log for this page.
| Page creator | Epsilon (talk | contribs) |
| Date of page creation | 17:33, 28 January 2023 |
| Latest editor | Tardis sysadmin (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 22:16, 25 February 2024 |
| Total number of edits | 51 |
| Total number of distinct authors | 2 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 0 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
| Transcluded templates (3) | Templates used on this page:
|
| Page transcluded on (1) | Template used on this page:
|
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | For around the past decade-and-a-half, this Wiki has drawn a Line in the Sand about what fiction can be a valid source for writing in-universe articles, by essentially judging a given source — aka a piece of fiction — based on a set of essentially four pieces of critera. But for a small amount arbitrary of arbitrary reasons, non-narrative fiction has been on the Other Side of the Line in the Sand, as it is treated as an "invalid source". |
Information from
Extension:WikiSEO
