Information for "User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170222073756/@comment-5918438-20170304215037"

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference

Basic information

Display titleUser:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170222073756/@comment-5918438-20170304215037
Default sort keySOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-4028641-20170222073756/@comment-5918438-20170304215037
Page length (in bytes)1,768
NamespaceUser
Page ID336545
Page content languageen - English
Page content modelwikitext
User ID5918438
Indexing by robotsAllowed
Number of redirects to this page0
Number of subpages of this page0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects)

Page protection

EditAllow all users (infinite)
MoveAllow all users (infinite)
View the protection log for this page.

Edit history

Page creatorSV7 (talk | contribs)
Date of page creation13:57, 27 April 2023
Latest editorBotgo50 (talk | contribs)
Date of latest edit19:23, 22 April 2024
Total number of edits3
Total number of distinct authors2
Recent number of edits (within past 90 days)0
Recent number of distinct authors0

Page properties

Page transcluded on (1)

Template used on this page:

SEO properties

Description

Content

Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements.
Well, we don't deem stories invalid simply for discontinuity, and not everything is always explained. We don't need it to be explained how the Daleks got there, necessarily, for it to be valid, but it would certainly help the case a lot. In this case, though, that's not the only issue. If an episode of Doctor Who gave us no context for how..hang on, we never really know how the Daleks show up again after getting defeated and destroyed entirely the season before. :P We don't need answers to how Davros survived his Journey's End to allow season 9 as a whole to be considered valid.
Information from Extension:WikiSEO