Talk:Ian Levine: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Josiah Rowe (talk | contribs) (Created page with "==Victor Kennedy== Is there a particular reason why the article doesn't mention the widespread belief that Victor Kennedy in ''Love & Monsters'' was based on Levine? It's mention...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Victor Kennedy== | ==Victor Kennedy== | ||
Is there a particular reason why the article doesn't mention the widespread belief that Victor Kennedy in ''Love & Monsters'' was based on Levine? It's mentioned in his {{w|Ian Levine|Wikipedia article}}, with two citations. If it's good enough to meet Wikipedia's BLP standards, why not mention it here? —[[User:Josiah Rowe|Josiah Rowe]] <sup>[[User talk:Josiah Rowe|talk to me]]</sup> 16:49, April 24, 2012 (UTC) | Is there a particular reason why the article doesn't mention the widespread belief that Victor Kennedy in ''Love & Monsters'' was based on Levine? It's mentioned in his {{w|Ian Levine|Wikipedia article}}, with two citations. If it's good enough to meet Wikipedia's BLP standards, why not mention it here? —[[User:Josiah Rowe|Josiah Rowe]] <sup>[[User talk:Josiah Rowe|talk to me]]</sup> 16:49, April 24, 2012 (UTC) | ||
:I'd say it's because it's based on an observation rather than any concrete proof from within the production. | |||
:The Guardian article specifically says "rumours persist" about it, if there's any actual proof that rumours were circulating then maybe we can include ''that'' information that rumour circulated about Levine being the inspiration. But going by Wikipedia's sources it's just an interview observation and a Guardian article off handedly mentioning rumours. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] / '''[[User talk:Tangerineduel|talk]]''' 17:10, April 24, 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:10, 24 April 2012
Victor Kennedy
Is there a particular reason why the article doesn't mention the widespread belief that Victor Kennedy in Love & Monsters was based on Levine? It's mentioned in his Wikipedia article, with two citations. If it's good enough to meet Wikipedia's BLP standards, why not mention it here? —Josiah Rowe talk to me 16:49, April 24, 2012 (UTC)
- I'd say it's because it's based on an observation rather than any concrete proof from within the production.
- The Guardian article specifically says "rumours persist" about it, if there's any actual proof that rumours were circulating then maybe we can include that information that rumour circulated about Levine being the inspiration. But going by Wikipedia's sources it's just an interview observation and a Guardian article off handedly mentioning rumours. --Tangerineduel / talk 17:10, April 24, 2012 (UTC)
