Forum:Infobox: Species actors: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary |
m (Robot: Automated text replacement (-header|Panopticon +header|Tech notes)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Forumheader| | {{Forumheader|Tech notes}} | ||
<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | ||
Revision as of 22:08, 6 May 2012
Index → Tech notes → Infobox: Species actors
Spoilers are strongly policed here.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
Will it be reasonable to add an species actor/voice actor to it's infobox, since most of them are played by actors and with some not having an individuals page? MM/Want to talk? 18:20, March 26, 2012 (UTC)
- Mmmm, seems like that would open a can of worms for really long-lasting species. What character-less species are you thinking of in particular? -- Tybort (talk page) 19:05, March 26, 2012 (UTC)
- I'd tend to agree that actors for whole species would make the infobox grow to an unacceptable length. Just think about the number of Dalek Operators alone! Plus you get into the whole question of who's in the credits and who's not, and do you then have to add a citation for all the people who aren't in the credits. I don't see this as a workable idea at all, I'm afraid.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ <span style="">21:02: Mon 26 Mar 2012
- I'd tend to agree that actors for whole species would make the infobox grow to an unacceptable length. Just think about the number of Dalek Operators alone! Plus you get into the whole question of who's in the credits and who's not, and do you then have to add a citation for all the people who aren't in the credits. I don't see this as a workable idea at all, I'm afraid.
