Forum:Tenth Doctor novels: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Undo revision 908542 by CzechBot (talk))
m (Robot: Automated text replacement (-[Ff]orum archives header +archive))
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Forum archives header|Panopticon archives}}[[category:out of date]]
{{archive|Panopticon archives}}[[category:out of date]]
<!-- Please put your content under this line.  Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ -->
<!-- Please put your content under this line.  Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ -->
I added all the novels that were in Tenth Doctor Adventures to the Tenth Doctor novels category in case the former category is deleted.
I added all the novels that were in Tenth Doctor Adventures to the Tenth Doctor novels category in case the former category is deleted.
Line 6: Line 6:
Actually, what is happening to the book navigation templates and the two sub-categories of BBC New Series Adventures? If someone's changing the links, should they remove the navigation templates and change the category to BBC New Series Adventure?--[[User:Nyktimos|Nyktimos]] 03:36, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
Actually, what is happening to the book navigation templates and the two sub-categories of BBC New Series Adventures? If someone's changing the links, should they remove the navigation templates and change the category to BBC New Series Adventure?--[[User:Nyktimos|Nyktimos]] 03:36, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
==Archiver's note==
==Archiver's note==
Americanwhofan's actions, above, still stand to this day.  Ten's novels do remain in [[category:Tenth Doctor novels]], and [[:category:Tenth Doctor Adventures]] got deleted.  [[:Category:BBC New Series Adventures|BBC New Series Adventures]], referenced by Nyktimos, also stands, and there's just a joint NSA template.  So this became policy even though it seems like it's just a statement followed by a question. It's possible that Americanwhofan and Nyktimos missed earlier discussions on the matter.  {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}&nbsp;<span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">'''02:56:57 Tue&nbsp;'''24 May 2011&nbsp;</span>
Americanwhofan's actions, above, still stand to this day.  Ten's novels do remain in [[:category:Tenth Doctor novels]], and [[:category:Tenth Doctor Adventures]] got deleted.  [[:Category:BBC New Series Adventures|BBC New Series Adventures]], referenced by Nyktimos, also stands, and there's just a joint NSA template.  So this became policy even though it seems like it's just a statement followed by a question. It's possible that Americanwhofan and Nyktimos missed earlier discussions on the matter.  {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}&nbsp;<span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">'''02:56:57 Tue&nbsp;'''24 May 2011&nbsp;</span>

Latest revision as of 22:54, 6 May 2012

ForumsArchive indexPanopticon archives → Tenth Doctor novels
This thread has been archived.
Please create a new thread on the new forums if you want to talk about this topic some more.
Please DO NOT add to this discussion.

I added all the novels that were in Tenth Doctor Adventures to the Tenth Doctor novels category in case the former category is deleted. Americanwhofan 08:22, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Actually, what is happening to the book navigation templates and the two sub-categories of BBC New Series Adventures? If someone's changing the links, should they remove the navigation templates and change the category to BBC New Series Adventure?--Nyktimos 03:36, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Archiver's note[[edit source]]

Americanwhofan's actions, above, still stand to this day. Ten's novels do remain in category:Tenth Doctor novels, and category:Tenth Doctor Adventures got deleted. BBC New Series Adventures, referenced by Nyktimos, also stands, and there's just a joint NSA template. So this became policy even though it seems like it's just a statement followed by a question. It's possible that Americanwhofan and Nyktimos missed earlier discussions on the matter.
czechout<staff />    <span style="">02:56:57 Tue 24 May 2011