Forum:Cybertombs: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary
m (Robot: Automated text replacement (-[Ff]orum archives header +archive))
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Forum archives header|Panopticon archives}}&nbsp
{{archive|Panopticon archives}}[[Category:Page-specific discussions]]
<!-- Please put your content under this line.  Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ -->
<!-- Please put your content under this line.  Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ -->



Latest revision as of 22:57, 6 May 2012

ForumsArchive indexPanopticon archives → Cybertombs
This thread has been archived.
Please create a new thread on the new forums if you want to talk about this topic some more.
Please DO NOT add to this discussion.

its aboput the Cyber tombs article, i disagree that the cybermen entombed themselves because they were dying of a 'disease', thasts the reason why the cybermen cybernised themselves in the first place.

I thought a good reason would be a lack of constant power for the whole Cyberrace, i think the cyber controller refered to Mondas as the source of the constant power and now that this was destroyed the cybermen were desperately running out of a large power resource.

well thats what i thought anyway D:


Sclera1 12:29, 2 June 2009 (UTC) Sclera1

The Cyber-tomb article doesn't say anything about disease.
As for why they replaced parts of their bodies to become Cybermen that was because Mondas began its journey away from Sol, see Spare Parts for the beginnings of that (or The Tenth Planet for the end of that journey).
I'm not sure where you've read this information concerning the disease with regards to the tombs. --Tangerineduel 13:43, 2 June 2009 (UTC)


It said in the article Cybertombs on this wikia saying that the reason for the cybermen entombing themselves was because of a disease Sclera1 02:36, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

oh sorry, i think there is another article of the Cyber tombs Cyber-Tombs

Well, surely one of these should be deleted. My guess would be Cyber-Tombs, because it's really quite awfully written, and has already been flagged with Gone to Pot. I'm also not sold on the actual name that's being used by either article. Where are we getting the very odd hyphenation from? Why wouldn't it simply be Cybertomb, since other Cyber things also have no hyphens: Cyberwoman, Cyberman, Cybermat. I mean, Cybertomb is already a re-direct? What's the source that's preventing it from being the proper name for the article? CzechOut | 06:05, 3 June 2009 (UTC)


i agree Sclera1 07:15, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

For now I'll redirect Cyber-tombs to Cyber-tomb the only text based source I can find at this moment is BBC Image Gallery Tomb of the Cybermen. I don't remember if the word is actually used in The Tomb of the Cybermen or not (but even then we'd have to trust whoever did the subtitles as in dialogue it's a bit tricky to hear the difference between cyber-tomb and cybertomb). --Tangerineduel 07:19, 3 June 2009 (UTC)