Howling:Amy Ponds Job: Difference between revisions
Catkind121 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
m (Robot: Automated text replacement (-[Ff]orum archives header +archive)) |
||
(21 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{archive|The Howling archives}}<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes: ~~~~ --> | ||
<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes: ~~~~ --> | |||
I don't know whether this is true but the sun have picked up that Amy Pond's job will be a Kissogram. (I hope not). I first came across it on this link http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/cult/s7/doctorwho/news/a197176/new-who-companion-has-kissogram-job.html. It then says it on the suns website. I am appaled at this, and lets face itt young children as young as 5 or 6 will watch it so I highly think it will be true. you know what the sun is like. They lie and make things up. http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/showbiz/tv/2812063/New-Doctor-Who-assistant-will-have-a-saucy-job.html | I don't know whether this is true but the sun have picked up that Amy Pond's job will be a Kissogram. (I hope not). I first came across it on this link http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/cult/s7/doctorwho/news/a197176/new-who-companion-has-kissogram-job.html. It then says it on the suns website. I am appaled at this, and lets face itt young children as young as 5 or 6 will watch it so I highly think it will be true. you know what the sun is like. They lie and make things up. http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/showbiz/tv/2812063/New-Doctor-Who-assistant-will-have-a-saucy-job.html | ||
Line 13: | Line 12: | ||
For all we know is she could have attended someones hen party and been dressed like that, but not a Kissogram. I hope she is not a Kissogram as that would put many people of. --Catkind121 13:35, January 24, 2010 (UTC) | For all we know is she could have attended someones hen party and been dressed like that, but not a Kissogram. I hope she is not a Kissogram as that would put many people of. --Catkind121 13:35, January 24, 2010 (UTC) | ||
Ignore it it is so unlikely, she definatly is not a a policewoman from our time as she is wearing a mini-skirt and that is not police uniform. Digital Spy is reporting it from the Sun sources so so not true - they lie all the tiime about Doctor Who only 1 in 15 things is true. Its better that though than some of the rumours saying she is a stripper! lottie01 01:35, January 26, 2010 (UTC) | |||
Some say she is a policewoman and others that she is going to a hen night. Perhaps she is a policewoman going to a hen night, and thus wears a police-themed costume? -- [[User:Noneofyourbusiness|Noneofyourbusiness]] 03:51, January 26, 2010 (UTC) | |||
Yeah, she must be going to a hen night. -- [[User:Thetwelfthdoctor|the twelfth doctor]] 14:14, January 26, 2010 (UTC) | |||
If you look in the series 5 trailer when the doctor bursts through doors you can see the checkerd black and white police thingy on the wall so Amy Ponds job must be a policewoman | |||
Sorry to burst your bubble but I think that is just coincidently tiles. -- [[User:Michael Downey|Michael Downey]] 21:45, February 6, 2010 (UTC) | |||
I heard that kissograms wear police uniforms commonly as their "fancy dress," too. And as was said, her skirt is a little north of the knee... Plus, he was seen kissing the Doctor in the trailer out of nowhere. I believe kissograms are hired for things such as birthdays and what not (for adults, obviousaly not child-friendly), and when you think about it, it is technically the Doctor 11th regernartation birthday. Each regeneration is, in a way, a birthday for the Doctor. [[User:Delton Menace|Delton Menace]] 00:10, February 7, 2010 (UTC) | |||
The tiles on the wall cant be a coincidence. There are other things that tell us she`s a policewoman. As well as the tiles, she is wearing a police uniform. Give me a good reason for how these things aren't connected and then ill believe shes on her hen night or a kissogram. | |||
Well the tiles don't look like police tiles they just look coincidently black and white. I'm not saying she's not a police officer and I'm not saying she's not a kiss-o-gram/stripper because we can't tell unless it's confirmed or the actual episode but I still think them tiles have nothing to do with police but I wait to be proven wrong. -- [[User:Michael Downey|Michael Downey]] 18:34, February 9, 2010 (UTC) | |||
Then again....there was a photo released of her arresting Eleven. [[User:Thetwelfthdoctor|the twelfth doctor]] 21:23, February 9, 2010 (UTC) | |||
And she was seen ''kissing'' the Doctor, too. ;) [[User:Delton Menace|Delton Menace]] 01:04, February 10, 2010 (UTC) | |||
Is the next episode going to be set in 2010 or 2005.....cos in the previous episode....the doctor met Rose in 2005 and flew off from Earth..then was about to crash... Muhammed Hans 18:34 February 11, 2010 (UTC) | |||
I have a hunch that the Doctor is going to crash land in Leadworth in 2005 or the 90's and meet Amy as child but something is going on with her so he needs to go and meet her in the future to help her or the other way round, something like that. Like the way he meets Madame de Pompadour as a child and so on... I know that's because of the timeline being out of place in the fireplace but I think it's going to be like that like a monster controlling her or something to do with her life so he needs to help both of them. Complicated to understand but I get it if any one else does/doesn't. -- [[User:Michael Downey|Michael Downey]] 22:49, February 11, 2010 (UTC) | |||
It is confirmed that there will be child and adult Amy. Before that, there was a rumour that the episode would be set in 1995 and 2010, showing Amy as a child and an adult. There is no way the years will only be five years apart if it's going to be showing a 10 year or something old Amy and then 20 year or something Amy. That is roughly a span of 10 years - hint, hint, 1995 and 2010.[[User:Delton Menace|Delton Menace]] 14:39, February 12, 2010 (UTC) | |||
Forgive if I'm wrong, and I'm not trying to be rude here, but the difference between 2010 and 1995 is fifteen. Which is as close to ten as five is, just in the opposite direction. [[User:Feumas|Feumas]] 16:45, February 12, 2010 (UTC) | |||
Forgive my spelling error, I'm really slow at times. -_- But the point still stands: 1995 = young Amy and 2010 = adult Amy. [[User:Delton Menace|Delton Menace]] 11:39, February 13, 2010 (UTC) | |||
That it does! :) [[User:Feumas|Feumas]] 20:20, February 13, 2010 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 23:21, 6 May 2012
Please DO NOT add to this discussion.
I don't know whether this is true but the sun have picked up that Amy Pond's job will be a Kissogram. (I hope not). I first came across it on this link http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/cult/s7/doctorwho/news/a197176/new-who-companion-has-kissogram-job.html. It then says it on the suns website. I am appaled at this, and lets face itt young children as young as 5 or 6 will watch it so I highly think it will be true. you know what the sun is like. They lie and make things up. http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/showbiz/tv/2812063/New-Doctor-Who-assistant-will-have-a-saucy-job.html
The Sun has been known to lie, but DigitalSpy tends to tell the truth from my experience. What is a kissoram, exactly? It know it's not good, but that's about it. In the trailer, Amy Pond did start snogging the Doctor out of the blue while wearing a police uniform - in what appears to be her bedroom. Those things together may support that she is indeed a kissogram. I don't think a police woman would go around snogging people they barely know, wearing their uniform in their bedrooms.
If she is indeed a kissogram, then perhaps she undergoes some form of redemption by traveling with the Doctor, he changes her for the good? Still, I find it odd. Doctor Who has a very wide audience, so they can only go so far because of how many different types of people watch it. Delton Menace 12:13, January 24, 2010 (UTC)
Oh come on. It's the Sun! Always printing unreliable stories! Though that skirt is a bit north of the knee........-- the twelfth doctor 13:23, January 24, 2010 (UTC)
Why don't we just wait for the series and find out?. Excalibur-117 13:28, January 24, 2010 (UTC)
For all we know is she could have attended someones hen party and been dressed like that, but not a Kissogram. I hope she is not a Kissogram as that would put many people of. --Catkind121 13:35, January 24, 2010 (UTC)
Ignore it it is so unlikely, she definatly is not a a policewoman from our time as she is wearing a mini-skirt and that is not police uniform. Digital Spy is reporting it from the Sun sources so so not true - they lie all the tiime about Doctor Who only 1 in 15 things is true. Its better that though than some of the rumours saying she is a stripper! lottie01 01:35, January 26, 2010 (UTC)
Some say she is a policewoman and others that she is going to a hen night. Perhaps she is a policewoman going to a hen night, and thus wears a police-themed costume? -- Noneofyourbusiness 03:51, January 26, 2010 (UTC)
Yeah, she must be going to a hen night. -- the twelfth doctor 14:14, January 26, 2010 (UTC)
If you look in the series 5 trailer when the doctor bursts through doors you can see the checkerd black and white police thingy on the wall so Amy Ponds job must be a policewoman
Sorry to burst your bubble but I think that is just coincidently tiles. -- Michael Downey 21:45, February 6, 2010 (UTC)
I heard that kissograms wear police uniforms commonly as their "fancy dress," too. And as was said, her skirt is a little north of the knee... Plus, he was seen kissing the Doctor in the trailer out of nowhere. I believe kissograms are hired for things such as birthdays and what not (for adults, obviousaly not child-friendly), and when you think about it, it is technically the Doctor 11th regernartation birthday. Each regeneration is, in a way, a birthday for the Doctor. Delton Menace 00:10, February 7, 2010 (UTC)
The tiles on the wall cant be a coincidence. There are other things that tell us she`s a policewoman. As well as the tiles, she is wearing a police uniform. Give me a good reason for how these things aren't connected and then ill believe shes on her hen night or a kissogram.
Well the tiles don't look like police tiles they just look coincidently black and white. I'm not saying she's not a police officer and I'm not saying she's not a kiss-o-gram/stripper because we can't tell unless it's confirmed or the actual episode but I still think them tiles have nothing to do with police but I wait to be proven wrong. -- Michael Downey 18:34, February 9, 2010 (UTC)
Then again....there was a photo released of her arresting Eleven. the twelfth doctor 21:23, February 9, 2010 (UTC)
And she was seen kissing the Doctor, too. ;) Delton Menace 01:04, February 10, 2010 (UTC)
Is the next episode going to be set in 2010 or 2005.....cos in the previous episode....the doctor met Rose in 2005 and flew off from Earth..then was about to crash... Muhammed Hans 18:34 February 11, 2010 (UTC)
I have a hunch that the Doctor is going to crash land in Leadworth in 2005 or the 90's and meet Amy as child but something is going on with her so he needs to go and meet her in the future to help her or the other way round, something like that. Like the way he meets Madame de Pompadour as a child and so on... I know that's because of the timeline being out of place in the fireplace but I think it's going to be like that like a monster controlling her or something to do with her life so he needs to help both of them. Complicated to understand but I get it if any one else does/doesn't. -- Michael Downey 22:49, February 11, 2010 (UTC)
It is confirmed that there will be child and adult Amy. Before that, there was a rumour that the episode would be set in 1995 and 2010, showing Amy as a child and an adult. There is no way the years will only be five years apart if it's going to be showing a 10 year or something old Amy and then 20 year or something Amy. That is roughly a span of 10 years - hint, hint, 1995 and 2010.Delton Menace 14:39, February 12, 2010 (UTC)
Forgive if I'm wrong, and I'm not trying to be rude here, but the difference between 2010 and 1995 is fifteen. Which is as close to ten as five is, just in the opposite direction. Feumas 16:45, February 12, 2010 (UTC)
Forgive my spelling error, I'm really slow at times. -_- But the point still stands: 1995 = young Amy and 2010 = adult Amy. Delton Menace 11:39, February 13, 2010 (UTC)
That it does! :) Feumas 20:20, February 13, 2010 (UTC)