1,303
edits
More actions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
Tardis1963 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
:Also, I think you have to take into account that ''Shada'' was '''completely paid for'''. All the actors still got their fees, the crew still got paid, Douglas Adams certainly got a ''lot'' out of the deal because of the material's multiple reusages. This is very different to anything that happened with ''Nightmare'', which never was even cast. The fact that real money flows through the various departments is the usual litmus test for something being considered "in production". {{user:CzechOut/Sig}} <span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">14:37: Sat 26 May 2012 </span> | :Also, I think you have to take into account that ''Shada'' was '''completely paid for'''. All the actors still got their fees, the crew still got paid, Douglas Adams certainly got a ''lot'' out of the deal because of the material's multiple reusages. This is very different to anything that happened with ''Nightmare'', which never was even cast. The fact that real money flows through the various departments is the usual litmus test for something being considered "in production". {{user:CzechOut/Sig}} <span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">14:37: Sat 26 May 2012 </span> | ||
Ok, the way you've put it seems like it's story enough to be in the randomiser. I guess I never really realised how much it was more produced than ''Nightmare''. '''[[User:Tardis1963|<span style="background:#0E234E; color:white">Tardis1963</span>]]''' '''[[User talk:Tardis1963|<span style="background:#0E234E; color:white">talk</span>]]''' 10:12, May 27, 2012 (UTC) | |||