190
edits
More actions
→Switching to a more negative stance
| Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
:In light of this information I have no issues with it being placed in the NC category and not being included in our regular coverage. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] / '''[[User talk:Tangerineduel|talk]]''' 16:19, June 4, 2012 (UTC) | :In light of this information I have no issues with it being placed in the NC category and not being included in our regular coverage. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] / '''[[User talk:Tangerineduel|talk]]''' 16:19, June 4, 2012 (UTC) | ||
::"Canon" arguments in a franchise that specifically eschews canon are meaningless. Nobody's arguing that ''Death Comes to Time'' doesn't belong on the wiki (or that it's not "in the scope of the wiki"); you're just arguing about what labels to slap on it. Well, the BBC didn't slap a label on it. We have some quotes from people involved in making it, but those people don't control the franchise now. None of this is helpful to readers or editors, Czechout; it's misleading to those who might be given the impression the ''Doctor Who'' universe is more formally structured than it actually is. It would be simpler if ''Doctor Who''were a franchise in which we could confidently say that events that plainly take place outside of other continuity are noncanonical, but it isn't and we can't. -- [[User:Rowan Earthwood|Rowan Earthwood]] <sup>[[User talk:Rowan Earthwood|talk to me]]</sup> 14:10, June 5, 2012 (UTC) | |||