Talk:Torchwood (series): Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:Yeah. Why wouldn't it be? -<[[User:Azes13|Azes13]] 03:10, 30 June 2008 (UTC)>- | :Yeah. Why wouldn't it be? -<[[User:Azes13|Azes13]] 03:10, 30 June 2008 (UTC)>- | ||
::Yeah, I asked that before I'd had a good look around and realized that just about everything is canon. Not entirely sure if I like that as it tends to get overwhelming, and some of it, especially the book series' tend to retcon whenever they feel like it. It certainly does keep it simple! [[Special:Contributions/66.215.20.28|66.215.20.28]] 16:02, 30 June 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:02, 30 June 2008
Forgive me if this is out of line, I'm still very new to all of this, and I don't want to step on anyone's toes, but shouldn't there be a disambiguation page here, with one leading to the show and the other to the agency?
--The Professor 02:47, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
I suspect all the information about the agency would be put in Torchwood Institute. Azes13 03:34, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
We may need to do this when the series starts, depending on what Jack and his team actually call themselves; somehow I don't imagine they'll be referring to their operation as the Torchwood Institute (we already know they're a "rogue" group). -- Guybrush 01:19, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
Is Torchwood (series) canon? 66.215.20.28 02:27, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah. Why wouldn't it be? -<Azes13 03:10, 30 June 2008 (UTC)>-
- Yeah, I asked that before I'd had a good look around and realized that just about everything is canon. Not entirely sure if I like that as it tends to get overwhelming, and some of it, especially the book series' tend to retcon whenever they feel like it. It certainly does keep it simple! 66.215.20.28 16:02, 30 June 2008 (UTC)