Forum:Doctor Who and the Related Videos Spambot: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I just noticed a surfeit of spam links in the Related Videos sections of articles. see the Recent Changes logs for this. --[[Special:Contributions/50.138.227.67|50.138.227.67]]<sup>[[User talk:50.138.227.67#top|talk to me]]</sup> 00:20, August 20, 2012 (UTC) | I just noticed a surfeit of spam links in the Related Videos sections of articles. see the Recent Changes logs for this. --[[Special:Contributions/50.138.227.67|50.138.227.67]]<sup>[[User talk:50.138.227.67#top|talk to me]]</sup> 00:20, August 20, 2012 (UTC) | ||
:Please elaborate. What makes you think it's spam? I've recently added hundreds of videos to the site. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}} <span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">19:25: Mon 20 Aug 2012 </span> | :Please elaborate. What makes you think it's spam? I've recently added hundreds of videos to the site. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}} <span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">19:25: Mon 20 Aug 2012 </span> | ||
::I've just examined recent changes to the RelatedVideos [[namespace]]. I can't see any spam. Just because you see a ''lot'' of activity in a certain namespace doesn't necessarily mean that it's spam. On the other hand, if you can provide evidence of activity that falls foul of [[T:RVID]], I'm all ears. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}} <span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">19:30: Mon 20 Aug 2012 </span> |
Revision as of 19:30, 20 August 2012
Index → Panopticon → Doctor Who and the Related Videos Spambot
Spoilers are strongly policed here.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
trouble
I just noticed a surfeit of spam links in the Related Videos sections of articles. see the Recent Changes logs for this. --50.138.227.67talk to me 00:20, August 20, 2012 (UTC)
- Please elaborate. What makes you think it's spam? I've recently added hundreds of videos to the site.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ <span style="">19:25: Mon 20 Aug 2012- I've just examined recent changes to the RelatedVideos namespace. I can't see any spam. Just because you see a lot of activity in a certain namespace doesn't necessarily mean that it's spam. On the other hand, if you can provide evidence of activity that falls foul of T:RVID, I'm all ears.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ <span style="">19:30: Mon 20 Aug 2012
- I've just examined recent changes to the RelatedVideos namespace. I can't see any spam. Just because you see a lot of activity in a certain namespace doesn't necessarily mean that it's spam. On the other hand, if you can provide evidence of activity that falls foul of T:RVID, I'm all ears.