Forum:Removal of empty myths section: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Mini-mitch (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Forumheader|Panopticon}} <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> Has anyone got any objections to the removal of th...") |
m (Sorry for having to do this, but I'm being forced to change my sig, and clean up after it, by Wikia Staff) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{archive|Panopticon archives}}[[category:design changers]] | ||
<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
The myths section can be easily added, if, somehow a myth is found for a story. [[User:Mini-mitch|MM]]/<small>[[User talk:Mini-mitch|Want to talk?]]</small> 20:08, April 26, 2012 (UTC) | The myths section can be easily added, if, somehow a myth is found for a story. [[User:Mini-mitch|MM]]/<small>[[User talk:Mini-mitch|Want to talk?]]</small> 20:08, April 26, 2012 (UTC) | ||
That sounds fine by me, it's open to quite alot of abuse otherwise. --[[User:Revanvolatrelundar|Revan]]\[[User_talk:Revanvolatrelundar|Talk]] 20:25, April 26, 2012 (UTC) | |||
:Removal in progress. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}21:12: Thu 26 Apr 2012 </span> | |||
Latest revision as of 04:15, 28 August 2012
Forums → Archive index → Panopticon archives → Removal of empty myths section
Has anyone got any objections to the removal of the empty myths/rumour section on a story page? By empty, I mean it has to be added under it. Personally, I think it makes the page look incomplete and shabby, and encourages myths like this to be added to the page.
The myths section can be easily added, if, somehow a myth is found for a story. MM/Want to talk? 20:08, April 26, 2012 (UTC)
That sounds fine by me, it's open to quite alot of abuse otherwise. --Revan\Talk 20:25, April 26, 2012 (UTC)
