Talk:Sacred Flame: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(name capitalisation)
 
m (Tangerineduel moved page Talk:Sacred flame to Talk:Sacred Flame: proper noun, see talk page)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Capitalisation==
==Capitalisation==
Shouldn't it be "Sacred Flame"? It's a proper noun. It's a thing they specifically worship and guard. Unless there's other examples of it? --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] / '''[[User talk:Tangerineduel|talk]]''' 04:23, August 29, 2012 (UTC)
Shouldn't it be "Sacred Flame"? It's a proper noun. It's a thing they specifically worship and guard. Unless there's other examples of it? --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] / '''[[User talk:Tangerineduel|talk]]''' 04:23, August 29, 2012 (UTC)
:I'm no fan of over-capitalization, but in this story it seems like a proper noun when they refer to it, so it should be capitalized. As it stands now, the article title is "Sacred flame", the first paragraph has it "sacred flame", the second paragraph has "Flame", the third paragraph has "Sacred Flame" and the fourth has both "flame" and "Flame". So some consistency would be nice. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 05:25, August 29, 2012 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 07:16, 30 August 2012

Capitalisation[[edit source]]

Shouldn't it be "Sacred Flame"? It's a proper noun. It's a thing they specifically worship and guard. Unless there's other examples of it? --Tangerineduel / talk 04:23, August 29, 2012 (UTC)

I'm no fan of over-capitalization, but in this story it seems like a proper noun when they refer to it, so it should be capitalized. As it stands now, the article title is "Sacred flame", the first paragraph has it "sacred flame", the second paragraph has "Flame", the third paragraph has "Sacred Flame" and the fourth has both "flame" and "Flame". So some consistency would be nice. Shambala108 05:25, August 29, 2012 (UTC)