Talk:79B Aickman Road: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
m (since {{Talk}} displays in the editing window anyway, this message is redundant)
 
(39 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Appearance==
 
Sigh...since go one else will bother to go here to file their complaint as according to the site policy, I will, because I respect the rules. The information is coincidental. Why is it up there? --[[User:Bold Clone|<span style="color:blue">'''Bold'''</span>]] [[User Talk:Bold Clone|<span style="color:gold">'''Clone'''</span>]] 22:05, February 4, 2011 (UTC)
{{ArchCat}}
:To me, it seems just like continuity. There are some bits of continuity on pages that state ''person X did thing Y is similar to what they did in situation Z''. There is no need to remove it, it's not speculation, like you said it's coincidental - so what? - because it is coincidental, there's nothing wrong with adding it to the Behind the scenes section - it's worthy of one. Unless you want to remove all 'coincidental' information removed from this wiki, just like you want every single thing that could be speculation? [[User:Mini-mitch|Mini-mitch]]\[[User talk:Mini-mitch|talk]] 22:10, February 4, 2011 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 05:30, 17 September 2012

Archive.png
Archives: #1