Talk:Kahler-Tek: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:Just my two cents, but as a reference "title", shouldn't the two be listed together, as "Kahler/Cyborg" and "Human/Dalek"? It would be more descriptive, and there wouldn't be any real disagreements about what they were on the episode. [[User:JustLittleOlMe|<font color="blue">Jay JLOM</font>]]<sup>[[User Talk:JustLittleOlMe|<font color="Fuchsia">Things turn out for the best for the people who make the best of the way things turn out - John Wooden</font>]]</sup> 06:59, September 21, 2012 (UTC) | :Just my two cents, but as a reference "title", shouldn't the two be listed together, as "Kahler/Cyborg" and "Human/Dalek"? It would be more descriptive, and there wouldn't be any real disagreements about what they were on the episode. [[User:JustLittleOlMe|<font color="blue">Jay JLOM</font>]]<sup>[[User Talk:JustLittleOlMe|<font color="Fuchsia">Things turn out for the best for the people who make the best of the way things turn out - John Wooden</font>]]</sup> 06:59, September 21, 2012 (UTC) | ||
::Cyborg isn't a ''species''; it's a medical condition. He's Kahler. And the infobox's code doesn't allow for hybrids anyway — you ''must'' pick a single species, so by convention, we pick the original species in the case of people who have been converted. If they were a genetic hybrid, then you'd need to create a page on what is effectively a new species. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}} 07:17: Fri 21 Sep 2012</span> | ::Cyborg isn't a ''species''; it's a medical condition. He's Kahler. And the infobox's code doesn't allow for hybrids anyway — you ''must'' pick a single species, so by convention, we pick the original species in the case of people who have been converted. If they were a genetic hybrid, then you'd need to create a page on what is effectively a new species. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}} 07:17: Fri 21 Sep 2012</span> | ||
::Thank you very much. What you said makes it clearer, anyway, as to their species. :) [[User:JustLittleOlMe|<font color="blue">Jay JLOM</font>]]<sup>[[User Talk:JustLittleOlMe|<font color="Red">Things turn out for the best for the people who make the best of the way things turn out - John Wooden</font>]]</sup> 08:21, September 23, 2012 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 08:21, 23 September 2012
This is a brilliant synopsis, so I hope that you don't mind my additions to it. Thank you for this wiki! :D Jay JLOMThings turn out for the best for the people who make the best of the way things turn out - John Wooden 07:47, September 16, 2012 (UTC)
Species[[edit source]]
Shouldn't the species description in the infobox be changed to "Kahler" instead of Cyborg as this was his original identification, the same as Oswin Oswald is listed as "Human" and not "Dalek"? Geek Mythology ☎ 14:25, September 16, 2012 (UTC)
- Just my two cents, but as a reference "title", shouldn't the two be listed together, as "Kahler/Cyborg" and "Human/Dalek"? It would be more descriptive, and there wouldn't be any real disagreements about what they were on the episode. Jay JLOMThings turn out for the best for the people who make the best of the way things turn out - John Wooden 06:59, September 21, 2012 (UTC)
- Cyborg isn't a species; it's a medical condition. He's Kahler. And the infobox's code doesn't allow for hybrids anyway — you must pick a single species, so by convention, we pick the original species in the case of people who have been converted. If they were a genetic hybrid, then you'd need to create a page on what is effectively a new species.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ 07:17: Fri 21 Sep 2012
- Cyborg isn't a species; it's a medical condition. He's Kahler. And the infobox's code doesn't allow for hybrids anyway — you must pick a single species, so by convention, we pick the original species in the case of people who have been converted. If they were a genetic hybrid, then you'd need to create a page on what is effectively a new species.
- Thank you very much. What you said makes it clearer, anyway, as to their species. :) Jay JLOMThings turn out for the best for the people who make the best of the way things turn out - John Wooden 08:21, September 23, 2012 (UTC)