Forum:SJA and companions of the Doctor: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:I wouldn't have thought you were right, no. Seems to me that SJS and Jo should simply have [[:category:Eleventh Doctor companions]] dropped from their list of categories. It's hard to argue them as companions of Eleven, in my mind. Since 2005, the role of "companion" has had much more to do with behind-the-scenes reasons (name in the titles, publicity announcements, etc.) than some sort of narrative litmus test. Given that we're talking about ''SJA'' appearances, it's more that he's their companion than the other way around. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}} 04:41: Thu 25 Oct 2012</span> | :I wouldn't have thought you were right, no. Seems to me that SJS and Jo should simply have [[:category:Eleventh Doctor companions]] dropped from their list of categories. It's hard to argue them as companions of Eleven, in my mind. Since 2005, the role of "companion" has had much more to do with behind-the-scenes reasons (name in the titles, publicity announcements, etc.) than some sort of narrative litmus test. Given that we're talking about ''SJA'' appearances, it's more that he's their companion than the other way around. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}} 04:41: Thu 25 Oct 2012</span> | ||
::If we follow this principle, then we should take off SJ and Jo from the category of the 11th Doctor companions, in order to be fair.--[[User:HarveyWallbanger|HarveyWallbanger]] [[User talk:HarveyWallbanger|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 09:49, October 25, 2012 (UTC) | ::If we follow this principle, then we should take off SJ and Jo from the category of the 11th Doctor companions, in order to be fair.--[[User:HarveyWallbanger|HarveyWallbanger]] [[User talk:HarveyWallbanger|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 09:49, October 25, 2012 (UTC) | ||
:::They have an adventure with the Eleventh Doctor, complete with accompanying him to another planet (albeit briefly and not via the TARDIS) this combined with their establised status as companions qualifies them as companions to Eleven IMO. [[Special:Contributions/182.239.152.47|182.239.152.47]]<sup>[[User talk:182.239.152.47#top|talk to me]]</sup> 15:42, October 25, 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:42, 25 October 2012
Index → Panopticon → SJA and companions of the Doctor
Spoilers are strongly policed here.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
Hello to everyone!
Since Sarah Jane Smith and Jo Grant are categorized on "Category:Eleventh Doctor companions" because of a single adventure along with that incarnation, I would like to add the categories:
- "Category:Companions of the Doctor" and "Category:Tenth Doctor companions" to Clyde Langer, Rani Chandra and Luke Smith (see The Wedding of Sarah Jane Smith)
- plus "Category:Eleventh Doctor companions" for Clyde and Rani (see Death of the Doctor).
Am I right?
HarveyWallbanger ☎ 23:39, October 14, 2012 (UTC)
- I wouldn't have thought you were right, no. Seems to me that SJS and Jo should simply have category:Eleventh Doctor companions dropped from their list of categories. It's hard to argue them as companions of Eleven, in my mind. Since 2005, the role of "companion" has had much more to do with behind-the-scenes reasons (name in the titles, publicity announcements, etc.) than some sort of narrative litmus test. Given that we're talking about SJA appearances, it's more that he's their companion than the other way around.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ 04:41: Thu 25 Oct 2012- If we follow this principle, then we should take off SJ and Jo from the category of the 11th Doctor companions, in order to be fair.--HarveyWallbanger ☎ 09:49, October 25, 2012 (UTC)
- They have an adventure with the Eleventh Doctor, complete with accompanying him to another planet (albeit briefly and not via the TARDIS) this combined with their establised status as companions qualifies them as companions to Eleven IMO. 182.239.152.47talk to me 15:42, October 25, 2012 (UTC)
- If we follow this principle, then we should take off SJ and Jo from the category of the 11th Doctor companions, in order to be fair.--HarveyWallbanger ☎ 09:49, October 25, 2012 (UTC)
