Tardis:Point of view: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{mosnav|p=Point of view|In-universe perspective|Out-of-universe perspective|Neutral point of view|c=Point of view}} | {{mosnav|p=Point of view|In-universe perspective|Out-of-universe perspective|Neutral point of view|We're Wikipedia's evil twin|c=Point of view}} | ||
{{moss|We have two types of article: those about narrative elements — like characters, weapons and species — and those about production elements — actors, directors and stories. Each type requires a particular approach.}} | {{moss|We have two types of article: those about narrative elements — like characters, weapons and species — and those about production elements — actors, directors and stories. Each type requires a particular approach.}} | ||
{{sc|T:POV|T:PERSPECTIVE}} | {{sc|T:POV|T:PERSPECTIVE}} |
Revision as of 03:12, 16 November 2012
In-universe perspective → Out-of-universe perspective → Neutral point of view → We're Wikipedia's evil twin → |
Articles about narrative elements are also called "in-universe articles". The bulk of these are written as if the topic were real, but one that no longer exists. For this reason, they are written in the past tense. Read more ...
Articles about out-of-universe things are also called "real world articles". Generally, these, too, should be written in the past tense, in order to minimise the amount of editing that has to be done on the article in the future. However, there are some instances in which the present tense may be warranted. Read more...