Forum:Magnus, Divided Loyalties and more: Difference between revisions

Forum:Magnus, Divided Loyalties and more (view source)

Revision as of 13:56, 30 November 2012

1,873 bytes added , 30 November 2012

no edit summary

Anonymous user

41.133.1.212

@@ Line 374: / Line 374: @@
 [[Special:Contributions/137.158.153.203|137.158.153.203]]<sup>[[User talk:137.158.153.203#top|talk to me]]</sup> 07:17, November 30, 2012 (UTC)
+The problem here is that the discussion has basically gone something like this"
+:I have real-world sources saying that Magnus from Flashback was specifically created to be The Master, and that the writers of the Brayshaw and Delgado serials say the Master and the War Chief are the same guy.
+TW:Sorry, we only go with '''narrative''' sources. Those real-world sources can go in behind-the-scenes information, but it's narrative sources we want.
+:(supplies multiple narrative sources providing overwhelming evidence that the Master is the War Chief)
+TW:Er, No, that's just ''implied''. Do you have anything that ever explicitly says "The War Chief is The Master"?
+:Not in those exact words, no.
+TW:Well, then, it's not good enough.
+:Ok, but then it never explicitly says in Divided Loyalties that magnus is the War Chief, it's only implied. By the way, why does it say on multiple pages that "Several novels explicitly state that The War chief isn't The Master", when in fact, '''one''' novel ''implies'' it, but in fact nothing ever states that explicitly?
+TW:We didn't edit that, someone else must have(...note some of those articles are locked, and only admins can edit them. So if the admins didn't...) Oh, and we don't need the narrative sources to spoonfeed us, a sly reference will do. And it mentions the War Games in divided Loyalties, and that Magnus was part of it.
+:Ok, if we don't actually need explicit mentions after all, then what about the numerous implied narrative sources linking the Master to the War games, the Master to the War Chief etc.?
+TW:You are a stubborn, obstinate, hollow Tootsie-Pop. We only go with '''narrative''' sources. And it needs to '''explicitly''' state something.
+(repeat) [[Special:Contributions/41.133.1.212|41.133.1.212]]<sup>[[User talk:41.133.1.212#top|talk to me]]</sup> 13:56, November 30, 2012 (UTC)