Tardis:Canon policy: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Line 21: Line 21:
==What is considered a Valid Resource?==
==What is considered a Valid Resource?==
''This section is still in flux, as the policy is still under debate.''
''This section is still in flux, as the policy is still under debate.''
*All [[List of television stories|television stories]], (i.e., "[[An Unearthly Child]]" - "[[Last of the Time Lords]]," and beyond)
*All [[List of television stories|television stories]], (i.e., "[[An Unearthly Child]]" - "[[Journey's End]]," and beyond)
*Both [[:Category:Theatrical movies|Dalek movies]] starring [[Peter Cushing]] (i.e., "[[Dr. Who and the Daleks]]," "[[Daleks - Invasion Earth 2150 AD]]", provided they are dealt with in article specific articles)
*Both [[:Category:Theatrical movies|Dalek movies]] starring [[Peter Cushing]] (i.e., "[[Dr. Who and the Daleks]]," "[[Daleks - Invasion Earth 2150 AD]]", provided they are dealt with in article specific articles)
*All [[Target Books]] novels ''not'' based on a broadcast television story (i.e., "[[The Nightmare Fair]]," "[[Turlough and the Earthlink Dilemma]]")   
*All [[Target Books]] novels ''not'' based on a broadcast television story (i.e., "[[The Nightmare Fair]]," "[[Turlough and the Earthlink Dilemma]]")   

Revision as of 14:04, 19 July 2008

(Important: This is currently only a draft policy. Please feel free to expand upon this article, and also to discuss the issue on Tardis talk:Canon policy.)

The goal of the TARDIS Index File is to be a reliable, concise guide to all readers. Towards this end, it is necessary for us to restrict to some extent the type of information we accept.

There are four types of articles:

  • The Doctor Who Universe
  • Any subject mentioned in or derived from a television story, prose story, radio or audio drama This type is further divided into two sub-types:
  • The Television Series - Any subject mentioned in or derived from an episode of either the original or new television series.
  • "The Expanded Universe" - Any subject mentioned in or derived from the original (i.e., not based on a broadcasted television story) Target novels, Missing and New Adventure novels, BBC novels, Telos novellas and other prose works, BBC radio dramas, Big Finish and Dalek Empire audio dramas, television specials, pastiches, and parodies and other professionally produced spin-off material which may not be universally accepted as canonical by fans.
  • Other Universes - Stories which are not nessacarily part of 'canon' but based on Doctor Who stories such as ; the Peter Cushing Dalek movies and parodies such as The Curse of the Fatal Death.
  • Doctor Who Behind-the-Scenes
  • Includes episode and movie articles.
  • Novels, short stories, audio dramas, computer games, and other professionally produced materials.


The policy of the TARDIS Index File with regards to acceptable resources for use in articles is as follows:

Note: A resource is considered to be anything that can be referenced when writing/editing an article.

What is considered a Valid Resource?

This section is still in flux, as the policy is still under debate.

A History of the Universe, I, Who, About Time, and The Doctor Who Reference Guide are primary sources, and as such should not be repeated verbatim in articles. They may be referenced in part, although contributors should be aware that some speculation exists within them which may not be considered valid.

What is not considered a Valid Resource, and why?

This section is still in flux, as the policy is still under debate.

  • Novelisations of broadcast television stories by Target Books, as these often contain characters, dates, events, and settings not shown in the original television versions.
  • Roleplaying games (FASA), as these sometimes contain histories and other information which conflicts with the television and prose stories. (Although some material from the FASA game were later incorporated into the Missing and New Adventure stories.)
  • Fan-made blueprints and specifications
  • Fan fiction of any kind
  • Websites, unless information is clearly stated as sourced from a valid reference. (The Doctor Who Reference Guide meets this criteria, and so is considered valid.)

Items on which policy is unclear

Deleting Invalid Articles

If you believe an article contains nothing but non-canon information, or is sourced solely from non-valid resources, then the article should be noted with a {{proposed deletion}} template/banner, which will alert others to the article's invalidity and allow others to defend it.

If an article is concerning a canon subject but contains information from a non-valid resource, the issue should be debated on the article's individual talk page, and the article should be edited as appropriate. (See also Templates - Cleanup Tags for more information)

Except in cases of vandalism, obscenity, and other nonsense, you should not edit the article and simply delete the text.