Theory:K9 television discontinuity and plot holes/The Custodians: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
m (Robot: Adding Category:K9 TV discontinuity) |
m (CzechBot moved page Forum:K9 television discontinuity and plot holes/The Custodians to Theory:K9 television discontinuity and plot holes/The Custodians without leaving a redirect: Robot: Moved page) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
[[Category:K9 TV discontinuity]] | [[Category:K9 TV discontinuity]] | ||
[[Category:K9 discontinuity]] |
Latest revision as of 04:18, 18 December 2012
You are exploring the Discontinuity Index, a place where any details or rumours about unreleased stories are forbidden.
Please discuss only those whole stories which have already been released, and obey our spoiler policy.
Please discuss only those whole stories which have already been released, and obey our spoiler policy.
This page is for discussing the ways in which The Custodians doesn't fit well with other DWU narratives. You can also talk about the plot holes that render its own, internal narrative confusing.
Remember, this is a forum, so civil discussion is encouraged. However, please do not sign your posts. Also, keep all posts about the same continuity error under the same bullet point. You can add a new point by typing:
* This is point one. ::This is a counter-argument to point one. :::This is a counter-argument to the counter-argument above * This is point two. ::Explanation of point two. ::Further discussion and query of point two. ... and so on.
- If data on the Etydions isn't recorded in K9's database because they are thought to be extinct, then why were the Aeolians?
- If people can win one Billion Pounds in the lottery, then how can a loss of 50 million credits bankrupt the Department?