Talk:Mighty Jagrafess of the Holy Hadrojassic Maxarodenfoe: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(reply)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:


:::I'm not inclined to count the cited website as fact (as it doesn't have any sources). In [[The Parting of the Ways]] the Doctor might have implied that the Daleks set up the Jagrafess at Sat 5, but that's a large step away from being enslaved. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 14:11, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
:::I'm not inclined to count the cited website as fact (as it doesn't have any sources). In [[The Parting of the Ways]] the Doctor might have implied that the Daleks set up the Jagrafess at Sat 5, but that's a large step away from being enslaved. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 14:11, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
::::So what do we do about this article, then?  Its lead is, from what you, me and Azes13 seem to be saying, without factual merit.  I'm going to throw up the prop delete on this one, cause the majority of its statements are legitimately, um, ''fact-challenged''. (How's that for a euphemism?)  '''[[User:CzechOut|<span style="background:blue;color:white">Czech</span><span style="background:red;color:white">Out</span>]]'''  [[User talk:CzechOut|☎]] | [[Special:Contributions/CzechOut|<font size="+1">✍</font>]] 12:38, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:38, 28 July 2008

When did it actually say that the Jagrafress was the species? -<Azes13 16:03, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

It didn't, frankly. Certainly not in the episode. And I never took away from the Long Game that ol' Max was actually being directly "enslaved" by the Daleks. He was a part of their plan, sure, but there's no explicit connection between the Daleks and him, I don't think. But maybe there's some obscure prose story out there. For the moment, I've flagged fact tags. Here's an alternative write-up. CzechOut | 23:19, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
I'm not inclined to count the cited website as fact (as it doesn't have any sources). In The Parting of the Ways the Doctor might have implied that the Daleks set up the Jagrafess at Sat 5, but that's a large step away from being enslaved. --Tangerineduel 14:11, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
So what do we do about this article, then? Its lead is, from what you, me and Azes13 seem to be saying, without factual merit. I'm going to throw up the prop delete on this one, cause the majority of its statements are legitimately, um, fact-challenged. (How's that for a euphemism?) CzechOut | 12:38, 28 July 2008 (UTC)