User talk:GusF: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(→Adding to year articles: new section) |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
|} | |} | ||
{{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}} 02:47: Fri 18 Jan 2013</span> | {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}} 02:47: Fri 18 Jan 2013</span> | ||
== Adding to year articles == | |||
Although this is hardly policy, I would greatly appreciate it if, when adding new information to and editing a year article, you would also do the same to the corresponding day of the year article. As I have been giving my sweat and blood to [[Thread:121256|cleaning the day articles up]], you'd be taking a lot off my work load by doing so. Also consider that it might be hard to find, and I might not even notice that the new information is there. For example, you recently added information to [[1943]]. You put it under [[6 October]], but later changed it to [[28 October|the 28th]]. But yet neither the articles [[6 October]] nor [[28 October]] have this information. Well... Now they do. Luckily, this time, I happened to notice this, and I added the information myself '''on my phone''', as I wasn't even home at the time. I'm sure you've done this many times before. Anyways, in the future, please add information to not just the year page but also to the day of the year page. Thanks. --[[user:SmallerOnTheOutside|The Doctor Detective Arch Architectural Bishop Baker Intern Inspector]] (aka. SmallerOnTheOutside). [[User talk:SmallerOnTheOutside|Now memorize that and contact me.]] 06:41, February 5, 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 06:41, 5 February 2013
Admin application
I've asked a new question at Tardis:User rights nominations#GusF 2.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ 19:15: Sat 08 Dec 2012
- New questions have been asked today.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ 17:46: Wed 12 Dec 2012- I have put out a second call for comments on your candidacy at Thread:117750. This thread is highlighted, which means that all registered users should be getting alerted to it. Hopefully, you'll get some kinda response. However, I don't want your candidacy going on forever, waiting in perpetuity for responses. Therefore your application will be closed, one way or the other, on no earlier than 30 December 2012 but no later than 1 January 2013.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ 07:19: Tue 25 Dec 2012
- I have put out a second call for comments on your candidacy at Thread:117750. This thread is highlighted, which means that all registered users should be getting alerted to it. Hopefully, you'll get some kinda response. However, I don't want your candidacy going on forever, waiting in perpetuity for responses. Therefore your application will be closed, one way or the other, on no earlier than 30 December 2012 but no later than 1 January 2013.
Use of prefixes
I notice from looking at the history of Quinnis that you seem to have a propensity for putting a prefix next to every story title. Please don't do this. Instead, group all the stories of the same medium together, use the prefix once, and separate by semi-colons. Also, take care not to over-wikify; once you've declared that you're talking about a particular medium, you don't need to use a prefix again until you start discussing another medium.
| current state of Quinnis | better |
|---|---|
| For the older Susan recounting the story, Quinnis occurs after AUDIO: An Earthly Child and before AUDIO: Relative Dimensions. | For the older Susan recounting the story, Quinnis occurs after AUDIO: An Earthly Child and before Relative Dimensions. |
| Meedla predicts that "dark misery" is in Susan's destiny. (TV: An Unearthly Child, TV: The Daleks, TV: The Reign of Terror, AUDIO: Lucie Miller / To the Death) | Meedla predicts that "dark misery" is in Susan's destiny. (TV: An Unearthly Child, The Daleks, The Reign of Terror; AUDIO: Lucie Miller, To the Death) |
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ 02:47: Fri 18 Jan 2013
Adding to year articles
Although this is hardly policy, I would greatly appreciate it if, when adding new information to and editing a year article, you would also do the same to the corresponding day of the year article. As I have been giving my sweat and blood to cleaning the day articles up, you'd be taking a lot off my work load by doing so. Also consider that it might be hard to find, and I might not even notice that the new information is there. For example, you recently added information to 1943. You put it under 6 October, but later changed it to the 28th. But yet neither the articles 6 October nor 28 October have this information. Well... Now they do. Luckily, this time, I happened to notice this, and I added the information myself on my phone, as I wasn't even home at the time. I'm sure you've done this many times before. Anyways, in the future, please add information to not just the year page but also to the day of the year page. Thanks. --The Doctor Detective Arch Architectural Bishop Baker Intern Inspector (aka. SmallerOnTheOutside). Now memorize that and contact me. 06:41, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
