Forum:Infobox for the Doctor's incarnations: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary |
Stardizzy2 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
:Seems like a good idea. Perhaps circumstances of regeneration might also be included. -<[[User:Azes13|Azes13]] 19:01, 28 July 2008 (UTC) | :Seems like a good idea. Perhaps circumstances of regeneration might also be included. -<[[User:Azes13|Azes13]] 19:01, 28 July 2008 (UTC) | ||
==lists of companions== | |||
::Sounds good in principle - the problem comes when listing the companions as people have different ideas on that. [[User:Jack's the man|Jack's]] [[User talk:Jack's the man|the]] [[Special:Contributions/Jack's the man|man]] - 13:24, 31 July 2008 (UTC) | ::Sounds good in principle - the problem comes when listing the companions as people have different ideas on that. [[User:Jack's the man|Jack's]] [[User talk:Jack's the man|the]] [[Special:Contributions/Jack's the man|man]] - 13:24, 31 July 2008 (UTC) | ||
| Line 23: | Line 25: | ||
:::Now that might work - although it still had the problem of "who are the companions". [[User:Jack's the man|Jack's]] [[User talk:Jack's the man|the]] [[Special:Contributions/Jack's the man|man]] - 15:46, 2 August 2008 (UTC) | :::Now that might work - although it still had the problem of "who are the companions". [[User:Jack's the man|Jack's]] [[User talk:Jack's the man|the]] [[Special:Contributions/Jack's the man|man]] - 15:46, 2 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
::::well, remember, guys, on a Wiki you can always change what you don't like. so if users have strong ideas either way, let consensus prevail. we also already have lists of companions which some people would dispute. [[User:Stardizzy2|Stardizzy2]] 16:05, 2 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:05, 2 August 2008
Index → Panopticon → Infobox for the Doctor's incarnations
Spoilers are strongly policed here.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
this would apply both to canonical (and non-canonical Doctors from Doctor Who Unbound, The Curse of Fatal Death, etc.) (the non-canonical category includes at least two female incarnations... suggested fields to include:
- Number of incarnation (if applicable)
- Debut story
- Last story (i.e. when he or she regenerates, if he has done so)
- Full list of companions
- Appearances (or link to a list of his/her appearances)
- Previous/Next incarnation (if applicable)
I may have proposed this in the forums before. --Stardizzy2 18:07, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
- Seems like a good idea. Perhaps circumstances of regeneration might also be included. -<Azes13 19:01, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
lists of companions
- well the companions listed can be the ones that most people are happy with and the rest can just be mentioned in the article somewhere. Dark Lord Xander 11:31, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
- No. That's not a solution because everyone is going to have an opinion on what 'most people' think. Could a link 'Full list of X Doctor companions' be better? --Tangerineduel 16:17, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
Like we have for appearances ? yes that could work cos it could be divided up into different media types Dark Lord Xander 23:30, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah exactly, that at least would keep everyone happy. --Tangerineduel 14:25, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
- well, remember, guys, on a Wiki you can always change what you don't like. so if users have strong ideas either way, let consensus prevail. we also already have lists of companions which some people would dispute. Stardizzy2 16:05, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
