Talk:Ian Chesterton/Appearances: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
m (Sorry for having to do this, but I'm being forced to change my sig, and clean up after it, by Wikia Staff) |
m (CzechBot moved page Talk:Ian Chesterton - List of Appearances to Talk:Ian Chesterton - list of appearances without leaving a redirect: Moving to sentence case per Thread:128711) |
Revision as of 05:53, 6 May 2013
What does that mean?
"Comprehensive but not definitive" What is the useful distinction? Boblipton 00:45, August 6, 2011 (UTC)
- What indeed. These lists of appearance pages piss me off so I don't spend much time here, precisely for this reason. They should be done automatically, through the use of categories, rather than being a managed list. The message shouldn't appear at all, as nothing on a wiki is ever truly "definitive" anyway. No need for only these appearance lists to bear such a message — especially since, as you rightly point out, there's no useful distinction between comprehensive and definitive. I think the person who wrote that was probably meaning to say, "comprehensive but not complete". But, as I said, no message like this should adorn these appearance list pages.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ 01:16:23 Sat 06 Aug 2011
Thanks, Czechout. I'll remove it.Boblipton 01:20, August 6, 2011 (UTC)
- It was one of those notes that was on many list of pages early on in this wiki's life, one of many things that was never removed.
- I think it was just to say 'we're still building this page, don't complain if story X isn't here'. --Tangerineduel / talk 15:08, August 6, 2011 (UTC)
