Forum:Canonicity of ''I Am the Doctor'': Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary |
Stardizzy2 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | ||
:I have not heard of this, but reading the descrition it looks like it just sumarises stories. I would probably say it was non canon, though I do think that as an official piece of merchandise we should note that it exists. [[User:Jack's the man|Jack's]] [[User talk:Jack's the man|the]] [[Special:Contributions/Jack's the man|man]] - 21:06, 4 September 2008 (UTC) | :I have not heard of this, but reading the descrition it looks like it just sumarises stories. I would probably say it was non canon, though I do think that as an official piece of merchandise we should note that it exists. [[User:Jack's the man|Jack's]] [[User talk:Jack's the man|the]] [[Special:Contributions/Jack's the man|man]] - 21:06, 4 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
:gah, don't know why I forgot to sign that. at any rate, it doesn't count as official merchandised. note the "un-authorized" part. it both summarizes stories and a little continuity of its own. --[[User:Stardizzy2|Stardizzy2]] 00:41, 5 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:41, 5 September 2008
Index → Panopticon → Canonicity of ''I Am the Doctor''
Spoilers are strongly policed here.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
canonical or whut?
personally I consider I Am the Doctor obviously non-canonical and not worth considering as such. but I wanted to hash this. like I said, I don't consider this even remotely canon for the following reasons:
- No one at the BBC (or any of the other license-holders, i.e. the estate of Terry Nation, which owns part of the copyright for the Daleks, AFAIK) authorized it.
- John Peel, the author of this book, has made definitive statements regarding how the Eighth Doctor regenerated, etc. not as speculation in the form of a nonfiction, but as Whoniverse fact. this makes the book a kind of fan fiction.
- As an un-authorized fictional story, I think this falls under the category of un-canonical fiction, just like The Doctor and the Enterprise. (hey, who can sure for sure that the Fourth Doctor didn't actually meet Captain Kirk, right?)
I would argue for not including this in the Wiki at all, if not for the fact that I believe in this Wiki listing this as aWho-related book, albeit un-official. like The Doctor and the Enterprise.
- I have not heard of this, but reading the descrition it looks like it just sumarises stories. I would probably say it was non canon, though I do think that as an official piece of merchandise we should note that it exists. Jack's the man - 21:06, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
- gah, don't know why I forgot to sign that. at any rate, it doesn't count as official merchandised. note the "un-authorized" part. it both summarizes stories and a little continuity of its own. --Stardizzy2 00:41, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
