Talk:The Doctor's first TARDIS: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Shambala108 (talk | contribs) m (Shambala108 moved page Talk:Tardis (The Name of The Doctor) to Talk:Tardis (Prisoners of Fate) without leaving a redirect: speedy rename) |
Shambala108 (talk | contribs) m (Shambala108 moved page Talk:Tardis (Prisoners of Fate) to Talk:TARDIS (Prisoners of Fate) without leaving a redirect: Tardis: TARDIS) |
Revision as of 15:23, 15 November 2013
Name
Why the move? It was never actually called just "The Doctor's TARDIS" in "Prisoners of Fate". It was either referred to as his "first TARDIS", "Type 50" or "Chronoscope" (by Sibor). JagoAndLitefoot ☎ 15:25, June 12, 2013 (UTC)
- Based on your info JagoAndLitefoot, should the page not be named Chronoscope? As that would be the most unique name for the page? --Tangerineduel / talk 15:56, June 12, 2013 (UTC)
- Not really, as it was the name that Sibor used for it, when she believed it to be a machine for predicting the future. After it's revealed to be the Doctor's first TARDIS, it's no longer referred to as "Chronoscope" by anyone, except maybe Sibor once or twice. So "Chronoscope" is what it was referred to because it was initially believed to be a machine for making prediction about the future, but it turns out not to be the case. So I think that "The Doctor's first TARDIS" is the best name for the article - it's still a unique name, as it's the only "first TARDIS" of his. JagoAndLitefoot ☎ 15:58, June 12, 2013 (UTC)
Type 50 in "Name of the Doctor"?
I haven't listened to Prisoners of Fate, but what evidence is there to suggest that the TARDIS the Doctor is considering before being interrupted by Gallifreyan-Clara is a Type 50? —Josiah Rowe ☎ 02:32, October 27, 2013 (UTC)
- I guess there is no evidence indeed. We could put it in italic, but... --HarveyWallbanger ☎ 10:37, November 2, 2013 (UTC)