User talk:Flowtron: Difference between revisions
(welcoming new contributor) |
m (Happy holidays) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I was a big fan, as a kid, of the mid-80's Doctors; started off with Peter Davison, then Colin Baker; after that it was a bit hard getting hold of episodes (not living in the UK at the time) - but we still saw stuff like "Happiness Towers" (build high for happiness) with Sylvester McCoy. I never /did/ see the movie, and it seems I wouldn't enjoy it. | |||
Then came 2005 and the awesome news that "Dr.Who is back!" - I was very uncertain of my feelings toward that news - reboots usually destroy what was originally so loveable about a series. But RTD (Russell T. Davies) was a "true" fan, naturally meaning "one to my liking", he had rejuvinated the series. While his tenure was ongoing I wasn't too hyped about all of what he'd done, but that would've been seriously curious anyway. But now .. | |||
.. now everything has changed. | |||
Reboots! Pah! | |||
The whole Steven Moffat tenure has just gotten worse and worse. And here I'd been praising all the excellent episodes he'd done in the RTD-led years - although I conciously always picked out "Blink" as one I'd not liked much myself - but I was really hopeful it'd get even better. No such luck. | |||
The new Doctor is a bit of a blundering, dangerously distracted and slapstick-heavy fool; always the plot has to suffer in favour of stupid innuendo, more slapstick, one-liners or semi-cleverly constructed puns. And it definitely isn't as much fun to watch as it seems to be to write in a disjointed-time-flow manner; Moffat loves telling stories back-to-front. This may be excusable in some cases, when it actually makes sense - I mean, if you understand the reasons for it after seeing it all. But this just seems, for me, to be some sort of incentive to make you "need to" watch the episodes a couple of times before you get all the pre-references. Sorry, but they're not worth watching again. | |||
So, I'll be going to watch from "Rose" till "End of Time"; call me when a new head-writer takes charge, maybe this show will be back on form then. --[[User:Flowtron|Flowtron]] 00:13, May 15, 2011 (UTC) | |||
{{Please see|Can we disable visual editor please?}} <br> {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}16:00: Tue 20 Dec 2011 </span> | |||
{{Christmas greetings}} | |||
: | |||
: | |||
Latest revision as of 08:24, 25 December 2013
I was a big fan, as a kid, of the mid-80's Doctors; started off with Peter Davison, then Colin Baker; after that it was a bit hard getting hold of episodes (not living in the UK at the time) - but we still saw stuff like "Happiness Towers" (build high for happiness) with Sylvester McCoy. I never /did/ see the movie, and it seems I wouldn't enjoy it. Then came 2005 and the awesome news that "Dr.Who is back!" - I was very uncertain of my feelings toward that news - reboots usually destroy what was originally so loveable about a series. But RTD (Russell T. Davies) was a "true" fan, naturally meaning "one to my liking", he had rejuvinated the series. While his tenure was ongoing I wasn't too hyped about all of what he'd done, but that would've been seriously curious anyway. But now .. .. now everything has changed. Reboots! Pah! The whole Steven Moffat tenure has just gotten worse and worse. And here I'd been praising all the excellent episodes he'd done in the RTD-led years - although I conciously always picked out "Blink" as one I'd not liked much myself - but I was really hopeful it'd get even better. No such luck. The new Doctor is a bit of a blundering, dangerously distracted and slapstick-heavy fool; always the plot has to suffer in favour of stupid innuendo, more slapstick, one-liners or semi-cleverly constructed puns. And it definitely isn't as much fun to watch as it seems to be to write in a disjointed-time-flow manner; Moffat loves telling stories back-to-front. This may be excusable in some cases, when it actually makes sense - I mean, if you understand the reasons for it after seeing it all. But this just seems, for me, to be some sort of incentive to make you "need to" watch the episodes a couple of times before you get all the pre-references. Sorry, but they're not worth watching again. So, I'll be going to watch from "Rose" till "End of Time"; call me when a new head-writer takes charge, maybe this show will be back on form then. --Flowtron 00:13, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
Your input is needed!
You are invited to join the discussion at Forum:Can we disable visual editor please?.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ 16:00: Tue 20 Dec 2011
Christmas cheer[[edit source]]
As this fiftieth anniversary year comes to a close, we here at Tardis just want to thank you for being a part of our community — even if you haven't edited here in a while. If you have edited with us this year, then thanks for all your hard work.
This year has seen an impressive amount of growth. We've added about 11,000 pages this year, which is frankly incredible for a wiki this big. November was predictably one of the busiest months we've ever had: over 500 unique editors pitched in. It was the highest number of editors in wiki history for a year in which only one programme in the DWU was active. And our viewing stats have been through the roof. We've averaged well over 2 million page views each week for the last two months, with some weeks seeing over 4 million views!
We've received an unprecedented level of support from Wikia Staff, resulting in all sorts of new goodies and productive new relationships. And we've recently decided to lift almost every block we've ever made so as to allow most everyone a second chance to be part of our community.
2014 promises to build on this year's foundations, especially since we've got a full, unbroken series coming up — something that hasn't happened since 2011. We hope you'll stick with us — or return to the Tardis — so that you can be a part of the fun!
