765,429
edits
More actions
User talk:Mini-mitch/Archive Talk 3 (edit)
Revision as of 09:15, 25 December 2013
, 25 December 2013Happy holidays
(→Stolen Planets: new section) |
m (Happy holidays) |
||
| (39 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<center>'''Please do not comment on this pages, as I won't read any comments that are on this page. Please leave comments on [[User talk:Mini-mitch|my other talk page]].'''</center> | |||
''' | |||
---- | |||
==Moved your talk archive== | ==Moved your talk archive== | ||
| Line 25: | Line 16: | ||
== SJA WIki == | == SJA WIki == | ||
I heard you were taking an active role in one of the SJA wikis. If you wan't another set of hands I'd be willing to help. - '' <span style ="color:midnightblue">I. Am. [[User: Excalibur-117| Excalibur-117]]''-<sup>([[User talk:Excalibur-117|talk]] • [[Special: Contributions/ Excalibur-117|contribs]])</sup | I heard you were taking an active role in one of the SJA wikis. If you wan't another set of hands I'd be willing to help. - '' <span style ="color:midnightblue">I. Am. [[User: Excalibur-117| Excalibur-117]]</span>''-<sup>([[User talk:Excalibur-117|talk]] • [[Special: Contributions/ Excalibur-117|contribs]])</sup> 23:17, October 15, 2010 (UTC) | ||
== hey are you alright == | == hey are you alright == | ||
| Line 47: | Line 38: | ||
How the hell is that vandalism so an episode which is coming out next month so don't think is true the BBC say its called the christmas carol and that katherine jenkins and that micheal fella is in it so why did u say that | How the hell is that vandalism so an episode which is coming out next month so don't think is true the BBC say its called the christmas carol and that katherine jenkins and that micheal fella is in it so why did u say that are you calling what i call editing vandalism so what we hhave to speak posh like one says the doctor says one might fight daleks. | ||
from [[User:Lewody1|Lewody1]] | from [[User:Lewody1|Lewody1]] | ||
| Line 70: | Line 61: | ||
--[[Special:Contributions/67.184.57.10|67.184.57.10]] 14:42, January 2, 2011 (UTC) (until such time as my new [[User:CrazyDreamer]] login gets fixed, anyway) | --[[Special:Contributions/67.184.57.10|67.184.57.10]] 14:42, January 2, 2011 (UTC) (until such time as my new [[User:CrazyDreamer]] login gets fixed, anyway) | ||
Or, of course, [[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] could come along and deal with the whole thing while I'm writing this up anyway. :D --[[Special:Contributions/67.184.57.10|67.184.57.10]] 14:47, January 2, 2011 (UTC) | |||
== TOC == | |||
Heh, everybody's talking to me lately about this TOC thing. I'm totally in the middle of writing it all up for the forum, in which I'll detail all the limitations and strengths of the change so that people can decide whether or not they want to keep it. Expect the forum post to come through sometime today. By way of short answer, though, tags are naturally pushed to the end of the TOC. They could be placed on top of the infobox, though, if you really think they absolutely ''have'' to be near the top of the article. | |||
It's the house style of Wookieepedia, incidentally, to place stub tags and the like at the top center of articles, rather than at the bottom of the page or the bottom of infoboxes. It's the house style of Wikipedia to put them at the bottom left. Nothing says they have to be under the infobox, and indeed, they're causing some problems when they're on the same page as a "sectuion cleanup" or "section update" tag. '''[[User:CzechOut|<span style="background:blue;color:white">Czech</span><span style="background:red;color:white">Out</span>]]''' [[User talk:CzechOut|☎]] | [[Special:Contributions/CzechOut|<font size="+1">✍</font>]] 17:57, January 3, 2011 (UTC) | |||
{{Please see|Moving the tables of content to the right}} '''[[User:CzechOut|<span style="background:blue;color:white">Czech</span><span style="background:red;color:white">Out</span>]]''' [[User talk:CzechOut|☎]] | [[Special:Contributions/CzechOut|<font size="+1">✍</font>]] 20:55, January 3, 2011 (UTC) | |||
== Voting == | |||
I just wish to apologize for removing your vote. I didn't see that specific version of the page in the RC. Sorry. --[[User:Bold Clone|<span style="color:blue">'''Bold'''</span>]] [[User Talk:Bold Clone|<span style="color:gold">'''Clone'''</span>]] 17:14, January 4, 2011 (UTC) | |||
== Ahem == | |||
[[Tardis:Manual of Style#Layout guide]]. Thank you. --[[User:Bold Clone|<span style="color:blue">'''Bold'''</span>]] [[User Talk:Bold Clone|<span style="color:gold">'''Clone'''</span>]] 19:54, January 5, 2011 (UTC) | |||
:Please read the layout guide. --[[User:Bold Clone|<span style="color:blue">'''Bold'''</span>]] [[User Talk:Bold Clone|<span style="color:gold">'''Clone'''</span>]] 20:02, January 5, 2011 (UTC) | |||
Where does the link say that all additional sub headings, expect footnotes and External links should come before Behind the scenes? I can't find anything like that. --[[User:Bold Clone|<span style="color:blue">'''Bold'''</span>]] [[User Talk:Bold Clone|<span style="color:gold">'''Clone'''</span>]] 20:16, January 5, 2011 (UTC) | |||
== See also == | |||
I've opened a topic on this in the Panopticon. Thanks--[[User:Skittles the hog|Skittles the hog]]--<small>[[User talk:Skittles the hog|Talk]]</small> 20:22, January 5, 2011 (UTC) | |||
==Sorry, but that was really annoying== | |||
I created new heading 'Regeneration' on the TARDIS page and I was editing it and you went and deleted it whilst I was in the middle of editing it. Thanks a bunch, Mini-mitch. [[Special:Contributions/90.215.45.50|90.215.45.50]] 18:10, January 22, 2011 (UTC) | |||
There is no heading ''Sixth version.'' [[Special:Contributions/90.215.45.50|90.215.45.50]] 20:25, January 25, 2011 (UTC) | |||
Aha! That makes sense. Thanks anyway, from [[Special:Contributions/90.215.45.50|90.215.45.50]] 22:22, January 26, 2011 (UTC) | |||
== Deletion process == | |||
While I thank you for offering me the opportunity to just remove delete tags, that's not how the process works. Once you propose a deletion, and give a rationale, I '''can{{'}}t''' just remove it. All I can do is make a comment on the talk page and leave it for discussion to continue and be resolved by admin. It's the same reason why I didn't just revert your stuff on [[Talk:Howling Halls]]. The discussion is the important thing. Simple reversion of what you do is not only rude, but it prevents you from contributing meaningfully to the wiki. If a record of what you do is left behind, even if what you do is ultimately judged to be a mistake, the community as a whole grows and improves by keeping your actions intact. '''[[User:CzechOut|<span style="background:blue;color:white">Czech</span><span style="background:red;color:white">Out</span>]]''' [[User talk:CzechOut|☎]] | [[Special:Contributions/CzechOut|<font size="+1">✍</font>]] 19:04, January 8, 2011 (UTC) | |||
::All that said, I have instantly reverted a couple of your tags, mainly to do with episode titles in the Hartnell era. All episodes should have a redirect to serials. Even if no one appears to link to them it is still useful to put "[[The Steel Sky]]" into the search box so that you can quickly realize, "Oh, that's a part of ''[[The Ark]]''." Also, I have found it useful to link to specific episode names when a point only applies to one episode as opposed to the whole serial. '''[[User:CzechOut|<span style="background:blue;color:white">Czech</span><span style="background:red;color:white">Out</span>]]''' [[User talk:CzechOut|☎]] | [[Special:Contributions/CzechOut|<font size="+1">✍</font>]] 22:39, January 9, 2011 (UTC) | |||
== Banning == | |||
:No, I actually meant that nothing has come to an agreement regarding the banishment policy. --[[User:Bold Clone|<span style="color:blue">'''Bold'''</span>]] [[User Talk:Bold Clone|<span style="color:gold">'''Clone'''</span>]] 22:13, January 24, 2011 (UTC) | |||
:Wrong. It only says the users risk banning. --[[User:Bold Clone|<span style="color:blue">'''Bold'''</span>]] [[User Talk:Bold Clone|<span style="color:gold">'''Clone'''</span>]] 22:21, January 24, 2011 (UTC) | |||
==Series 6 Page== | |||
It was decided on the talk page that the finale could be a single episode. You have no proof it will be two episodes. [[User:Alpha111|Alpha111]] 20:54, January 25, 2011 (UTC) | |||
: You have no proof it's a double episode. [[User:Alpha111|Alpha111]] 21:00, January 25, 2011 (UTC) | |||
:: It has been the case for previous seasons and should be kept so until it is confirmed otherwise. [[User:Revanvolatrelundar|Revanvolatrelundar]] 18:54, January 26, 2011 (UTC) | |||
:: | |||
:: | |||
:: Your evidence is less Revanvolatrelundar the structure has changed so assume nothing. SM is not going to let anyone else write the finale, he's said that this finale will be more intimate and that he will write 6 episodes including ACC. [[Special:Contributions/81.110.190.227|81.110.190.227]] 19:11, January 26, 2011 (UTC) | |||
::There is more evidence to support there being only one episode in the finale: | |||
::#SM has said he is writing 6 episodes including ACC | |||
::#The series structure has changed so relying on previous series is pointless. You delete episode names when you have no proof yet keep two-parts when you have no proof. | |||
::#SM has said that this finale will be more intimate | |||
So your case doesn't stand up. [[User:Alpha111|Alpha111]] 11:00, January 28, 2011 (UTC) | |||
Your proof doesn't prove anything apart from the fact that nobody know anything about the series finale.[[Special:Contributions/81.110.190.227|81.110.190.227]] 19:14, February 1, 2011 (UTC) | |||
==Protection== | |||
Hey, I've move-protected Rassilon's Final Solution (it's still editable) and I've fully protected Howling Halls. I've also added a comment to the Howling Halls page. Thanks. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] / '''[[User talk:Tangerineduel|talk]]''' 14:35, January 26, 2011 (UTC) | |||
== Forum invitation . . . == | |||
Hey, thanks for the invite. I'll pop along there directly. Just wanted to say that I very much appreciate the neutral invitations you've given to both this and the Howling Halls thing. That's good stuff :) You may also find it useful to use {{tl|Please see}} in future, when inviting someone to a forum discussion. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}} | |||
== Emilia == | |||
The correct spelling of a name was not speculation. It was an establishment of fact. IF I was to speculate then yes I would probably visit the howling - although the page you directed me to was too wordy, very user unfriendly I felt and, largely unhelpful I thought in explaining its point. Sorry. [[User:The Librarian|The Librarian]] 18:34, February 1, 2011 (UTC) | |||
==Admin request== | |||
I'm really very sorry with regards to your post on the User rights page. It's not that I ignored it, just one of the things I didn't get to. | |||
Do you still see it as a valid request? --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] / '''[[User talk:Tangerineduel|talk]]''' 13:36, February 2, 2011 (UTC) | |||
:I remember ''reading'' it back last July and then...I probably got distracted with vandalism or something. | |||
:In any case. Admin status granted (I have neither a star nor a mop and bucket (which is Wikipedia' mark of admin) to offer.) Feel free to ask me of any of the other admins any questions. You can also add your user name to [[Tardis:Administrators]] to check that your admin status is functioning (the page is admin protected). --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] / '''[[User talk:Tangerineduel|talk]]''' 11:47, February 3, 2011 (UTC) | |||
{{Please see|Can we disable visual editor please?}} <br> {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}20:07: Tue 20 Dec 2011 </span> | |||
{{Christmas greetings}} | |||