Howling:Into the Dalek - pathweb: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
It was not explained in the episode, so only speculation can be given. Perhaps I shouldn't have bothered, though, considering you don't seem to understand the concept. [[Special:Contributions/213.249.213.20|213.249.213.20]]<sup>[[User talk:213.249.213.20#top|talk to me]]</sup> 20:10, September 10, 2014 (UTC) | It was not explained in the episode, so only speculation can be given. Perhaps I shouldn't have bothered, though, considering you don't seem to understand the concept. [[Special:Contributions/213.249.213.20|213.249.213.20]]<sup>[[User talk:213.249.213.20#top|talk to me]]</sup> 20:10, September 10, 2014 (UTC) | ||
: To be clear, I was replying to the original post, not to yours. [[Special:Contributions/177.133.111.141|177.133.111.141]]<sup>[[User talk:177.133.111.141#top|talk to me]]</sup> 00:21, September 14, 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:21, 14 September 2014
This episode seems to inconsistently deal with Daleks. In Asylum of the Daleks we're introduced to the idea of a Dalek pathweb where they share information that is strong enough to delete information from every Dalek in the universe about the existence of the Doctor. In this episode if one Dalek decides it must kill every other Dalek, then why wouldn't that be shared among every other Dalek causing all Daleks everywhere to kill one another?
Rayz– The preceding unsigned comment was added by 184.15.38.188 (talk).
Maybe it was just Oswin's hacking skills that allowed her to access the Dalek pathweb. 213.249.213.20talk to me 10:32, September 1, 2014 (UTC)
- Most likely it wouldn't work like that, because it is an opinion/judgement, not information/fact. 187.78.45.176talk to me 18:43, September 9, 2014 (UTC)
It was not explained in the episode, so only speculation can be given. Perhaps I shouldn't have bothered, though, considering you don't seem to understand the concept. 213.249.213.20talk to me 20:10, September 10, 2014 (UTC)
- To be clear, I was replying to the original post, not to yours. 177.133.111.141talk to me 00:21, September 14, 2014 (UTC)