One Hit Wonder (documentary): Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
m (T:CLEAN CODE enforcement) |
Shambala108 (talk | contribs) (date cleanup) |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
|prev = | |prev = | ||
|next = | |next = | ||
}}'''''One Hit Wonder''''' was a [[2 entertain|2{{!}}entertain]] [[DVD]] documentary about the staying power of ''[[Doctor Who]]'' monsters. It was released on the DVD of ''[[The Ark]]'' in | }}'''''One Hit Wonder''''' was a [[2 entertain|2{{!}}entertain]] [[DVD]] documentary about the staying power of ''[[Doctor Who]]'' monsters. It was released on the DVD of ''[[The Ark]]'' in February 2011. | ||
It explored the almost comical presentation of the [[Monoid]]s. ''Wonder'' went on to explain how monsters that were "undiluted evil" usually had the highest staying power. They were also common if they could easily be instigated into an environment. When compared to such monsters, the documentary showed that the Monoids were not unique enough to make a return. | It explored the almost comical presentation of the [[Monoid]]s. ''Wonder'' went on to explain how monsters that were "undiluted evil" usually had the highest staying power. They were also common if they could easily be instigated into an environment. When compared to such monsters, the documentary showed that the Monoids were not unique enough to make a return. | ||
Revision as of 23:32, 27 September 2014
One Hit Wonder was a 2|entertain DVD documentary about the staying power of Doctor Who monsters. It was released on the DVD of The Ark in February 2011.
It explored the almost comical presentation of the Monoids. Wonder went on to explain how monsters that were "undiluted evil" usually had the highest staying power. They were also common if they could easily be instigated into an environment. When compared to such monsters, the documentary showed that the Monoids were not unique enough to make a return.
Matthew Sweet explained his view that "dodgy feet" were a contributing factor to the Monoids' non-return. Kim Newman compared to them to the Ood, suggesting the latter to be a modern take on the former.
