Talk:Nuclear weapon: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Created page with "==Nuclear pages== Currently, nuclear missile redirects here. It should have its own page, as should nuclear bomb, with the information from here being used to fill the...") |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Nuclear pages== | ==Nuclear pages== | ||
Currently, [[nuclear missile]] redirects here. It should have its own page, as should [[nuclear bomb]], with the information from here being used to fill them and this becoming the article for nuclear weaponry. At least, that's my assertion. Is anyone of a different opinion?--{{User:Skittles the hog/sig}} 15:09, October 6, 2014 (UTC) | Currently, [[nuclear missile]] redirects here. It should have its own page, as should [[nuclear bomb]], with the information from here being used to fill them and this becoming the article for nuclear weaponry. At least, that's my assertion. Is anyone of a different opinion?--{{User:Skittles the hog/sig}} 15:09, October 6, 2014 (UTC) | ||
:It may be not a proper in-universe perspective, but I would have one single page for weapon/missile/bomb, or at least for weapon/bomb. We could use subsections (and redirects to subsections) if we wanted to discern them.--[[User:HarveyWallbanger|HarveyWallbanger]] [[User talk:HarveyWallbanger|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 17:07, October 6, 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:07, 6 October 2014
Nuclear pages
Currently, nuclear missile redirects here. It should have its own page, as should nuclear bomb, with the information from here being used to fill them and this becoming the article for nuclear weaponry. At least, that's my assertion. Is anyone of a different opinion?--Skittles the hog - talk 15:09, October 6, 2014 (UTC)
- It may be not a proper in-universe perspective, but I would have one single page for weapon/missile/bomb, or at least for weapon/bomb. We could use subsections (and redirects to subsections) if we wanted to discern them.--HarveyWallbanger ☎ 17:07, October 6, 2014 (UTC)