Talk:Omega: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Page/infobox name)
Tag: sourceedit
Line 24: Line 24:


The account given of his "death" in "[[Omega (audio story)|Omega]]" is not actually inconsitent with that of "[[Star Death (comic story)|Star Death]]". Aside from Omega's corrupted memories, the only thing added in "Omega" is his assistant [[Vandekirian]]'s betrayal of Omega, but it's not inconceivable that Vandekirian assisted [[Fenris]] in some way etc. [[Special:Contributions/78.8.173.36|78.8.173.36]]<sup>[[User talk:78.8.173.36#top|talk to me]]</sup> 17:05, April 22, 2013 (UTC)
The account given of his "death" in "[[Omega (audio story)|Omega]]" is not actually inconsitent with that of "[[Star Death (comic story)|Star Death]]". Aside from Omega's corrupted memories, the only thing added in "Omega" is his assistant [[Vandekirian]]'s betrayal of Omega, but it's not inconceivable that Vandekirian assisted [[Fenris]] in some way etc. [[Special:Contributions/78.8.173.36|78.8.173.36]]<sup>[[User talk:78.8.173.36#top|talk to me]]</sup> 17:05, April 22, 2013 (UTC)
== Page/infobox name ==
While not disputing the true name of Omega, I thought the policy dictated that the name of the page had to coincide with the name in the infobox. The other name can be recorded in alias. [[User:Amorkuz|Amorkuz]] [[User talk:Amorkuz|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 22:14, September 25, 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:14, 25 September 2016

is the doctor omega/peylix???

I like the new picture, brilliant work whoever did it Bigshowbower 12:33, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Big Bad of Season 5?

Seeing as there's only a couple weeks left until we find out for sure makes this kind of superflous. Nonetheless where has Omega been "tipped" as the final enemy in series 5? Add a citation please, or don't add the information. If it's speculation go put it in 'rumours' for Pandorica Opens or Silence Falls. MegaNerd18 05:09, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

Removed. User:Solar Dragon/Signature 05:38, June 8, 2010 (UTC)
After watching Saturdays episode I think he is. 94.1.157.42 23:32, June 20, 2010 (UTC)
Think and know are very different. There's still nothing to say it really is Omega behind the TARDIS exploding. Indeed it could be an original villain. So for now, nothing changes. MegaNerd18 00:45, June 21, 2010 (UTC)
Personally, I think it's unlikely that they'd make someone totally original for something this big; they did that in the novel Sometime Never...- the people responsible for the crisis the Doctor was investigating as reality was collapsed to a single timeline were originally going to be the Daleks but they instead made it some people we'd never heard of called the Council of Eight- and it cost the story significant points. Besides, when you think about it, Omega's the most obvious candidate as he's the only foe the Doctor's fought who doesn't exist in this universe; even the Black Guardian would have just as much to lose from the universe being destroyed as everything else does given that he exists in this universe- much like in Dogma when the Metatron noted why Satan couldn't be responsible for what was happening-, whereas Omega, a resident of the anti-matter universe, would probably be able to come through the destruction perfectly fine (Maybe he's looking to 'enhance his power' like the Anti-Monitor from the DC Comics storyline "Crisis on Infinite Earths", whose power in his own anti-matter unvierse grew stronger the more positive matter alternate Earths he destroyed). MarcusSLazarus 08:40, June 27, 2010 (UTC)
Doctor Who novels don't matter to me, they're not canon, so I don't care. And having seen the finale, well, there was no Omega. So those theories will have to go on hold for another year. MegaNerd18 08:54, June 27, 2010 (UTC)
I know some people might not count the novels as canon, but the principal is the same; bringing in someone totally original for something on this scale just detracts from the effect...
Still, as you said, we'll just have to wait until next year to find out who's responsible for creating the cracks in the first place. MarcusSLazarus 08:57, June 27, 2010 (UTC)
Yeah I can see your point (though even the BBC and the show's staff generally disregard spin-off media), and Omega's quote about the destruction of the universe being a spectacle certainly puts him as a suspect. Next though are Egyptian goddesses on the Orient Express in space.MegaNerd18 09:02, June 27, 2010 (UTC)

Mentions

The mentions section appears to no not working. --OS24 02:01, December 25, 2011 (UTC)

The TARDIS Wikia page about Omega is wrong. Omega is not classified as a Time Lord. He gave the Gallifreyans the ability to travel through time and in the process was cast into the anti-matter universe. He is not a Time Lord.

Omega audio story

The account given of his "death" in "Omega" is not actually inconsitent with that of "Star Death". Aside from Omega's corrupted memories, the only thing added in "Omega" is his assistant Vandekirian's betrayal of Omega, but it's not inconceivable that Vandekirian assisted Fenris in some way etc. 78.8.173.36talk to me 17:05, April 22, 2013 (UTC)

Page/infobox name

While not disputing the true name of Omega, I thought the policy dictated that the name of the page had to coincide with the name in the infobox. The other name can be recorded in alias. Amorkuz 22:14, September 25, 2016 (UTC)