Talk:Caesofine gas: Difference between revisions
Shambala108 (talk | contribs) Tag: sourceedit |
Tag: sourceedit |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:::The rename tag is supposed to inspire discussion, so if you're ever in doubt, just add the tag. If it's not needed, someone will remove it, hopefully with an explanation. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 17:23, June 27, 2015 (UTC) | :::The rename tag is supposed to inspire discussion, so if you're ever in doubt, just add the tag. If it's not needed, someone will remove it, hopefully with an explanation. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 17:23, June 27, 2015 (UTC) | ||
I've renamed the page, and left a redirect behind because the lead offers that spelling as a valid alternative. Question is: is it at all a valid alternative, or is it erroneously in the lead just because we made the mistake of calling it that in the first place?{{User:SOTO/sig}} 14:34, November 23, 2016 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 14:34, 23 November 2016
Wrong Spelling ?[[edit source]]
I think the spelling "Sezerfine gas" is wrong, it is spelled "Caesofine" in "The Last Sontaran novelisation" (which is based on the script of the episode) + in the subs of the mentioned episodes. The user who created this page said "I have no idea if the spelling is correct though" so I think Caesofine would be the correct spelling. S.o. might want to check it. --Dynara ☎ 15:53, June 27, 2015 (UTC)
- If you think it's wrong, put up a rename tag (instructions at Template:Rename). Shambala108 ☎ 16:21, June 27, 2015 (UTC)
- The rename tag is supposed to inspire discussion, so if you're ever in doubt, just add the tag. If it's not needed, someone will remove it, hopefully with an explanation. Shambala108 ☎ 17:23, June 27, 2015 (UTC)
I've renamed the page, and left a redirect behind because the lead offers that spelling as a valid alternative. Question is: is it at all a valid alternative, or is it erroneously in the lead just because we made the mistake of calling it that in the first place?
× SOTO (☎/✍/↯) 14:34, November 23, 2016 (UTC)