Category talk:Doctor Who uncredited cast: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary
Tag: sourceedit
 
Line 1: Line 1:
=== Proposal ===
== Proposal ==
To avoid confusion, I propose that this category be used ''only'' for people who were ''never'' credited. Everyone else should be in "Guest Actors". [[User:Slughorn42|Slughorn42]] [[User talk:Slughorn42|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:30, September 12, 2014 (UTC)
To avoid confusion, I propose that this category be used ''only'' for people who were ''never'' credited. Everyone else should be in "Guest Actors". [[User:Slughorn42|Slughorn42]] [[User talk:Slughorn42|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:30, September 12, 2014 (UTC)


Line 5: Line 5:


::It's not just about recursion. It's about redundancy. Why include people who were credited (if only once) in this category? I just think it makes things easier to keep them separate. [[User:Slughorn42|Slughorn42]] [[User talk:Slughorn42|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:53, September 12, 2014 (UTC)
::It's not just about recursion. It's about redundancy. Why include people who were credited (if only once) in this category? I just think it makes things easier to keep them separate. [[User:Slughorn42|Slughorn42]] [[User talk:Slughorn42|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:53, September 12, 2014 (UTC)
:::To update, as of 2016, this has most definitely not been implemented. I would estimate that the majority of the '''''693''''' members of this category have been credited for other roles.{{User:SOTO/sig}} 03:52, December 10, 2016 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 03:52, 10 December 2016

Proposal[[edit source]]

To avoid confusion, I propose that this category be used only for people who were never credited. Everyone else should be in "Guest Actors". Slughorn42 21:30, September 12, 2014 (UTC)

I may be misunderstanding the situation, so correct me if I'm wrong, but couldn't you just put this category under Catageory:Doctor Who cast instead of Category:Doctor Who guest actors and avoid any recursion? P&P talk contribs 21:46, September 12, 2014 (UTC)
It's not just about recursion. It's about redundancy. Why include people who were credited (if only once) in this category? I just think it makes things easier to keep them separate. Slughorn42 21:53, September 12, 2014 (UTC)
To update, as of 2016, this has most definitely not been implemented. I would estimate that the majority of the 693 members of this category have been credited for other roles.
× SOTO (//) 03:52, December 10, 2016 (UTC)