Talk:The Time Traveller's Almanac (reference book): Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Tag: sourceedit
Tag: sourceedit
Line 1: Line 1:
== Non-fiction? ==
== Non-fiction? ==
 
I don't get what the main page means. The time-traveller's almanac is done in a "docufiction" style, but it is still fiction. It is not non-fiction, it treats the events of the TV series like they're real, and I think it should be counted as canon.{{Unsigned-anon|86.1.129.28}}
I don't get what the main page means. The time-traveller's almanac is done in a "docufiction" style, but it is still fiction. It is not non-fiction, it treats the events of the TV series like they're real, and I think it should be counted as canon.

Revision as of 03:55, 18 December 2016

Non-fiction?

I don't get what the main page means. The time-traveller's almanac is done in a "docufiction" style, but it is still fiction. It is not non-fiction, it treats the events of the TV series like they're real, and I think it should be counted as canon.The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.1.129.28 (talk).