Talk:John Fitzgerald (1963): Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary
Tag: sourceedit
No edit summary
Tag: sourceedit
Line 8: Line 8:
::You seem to have forgotten to log in. Hmm, okay. Maybe it ''should'' be "John (1963)", I'm not sure. Now it's been explained to me, though, the current title makes a lot more sense.{{User:SOTO/sig}} 06:02, December 23, 2016 (UTC)
::You seem to have forgotten to log in. Hmm, okay. Maybe it ''should'' be "John (1963)", I'm not sure. Now it's been explained to me, though, the current title makes a lot more sense.{{User:SOTO/sig}} 06:02, December 23, 2016 (UTC)
::: Yep, editing from a smartphone is not smart. [[User:Amorkuz|Amorkuz]] [[User talk:Amorkuz|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 06:12, December 23, 2016 (UTC)
::: Yep, editing from a smartphone is not smart. [[User:Amorkuz|Amorkuz]] [[User talk:Amorkuz|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 06:12, December 23, 2016 (UTC)
:::: Ha! Nor an easy feat at all. {{#replace:{{User:SOTO/sig}} 06:16, December 23, 2016 (UTC)|<br>|{{spaces|3}}}}

Revision as of 06:16, 23 December 2016

Why does this need disambiguation?

Are there any others in the DWU named John Fitzgerald? John F. Kennedy is John F. Kennedy, not John Fitzgerald. That's not to say there couldn't be a you may here, of course.
× SOTO (//) 00:41, December 23, 2016 (UTC)

The point I was making that John Fitzgerald are his first and second names, not first and last. For this reason, namesort should not be used. For the same reason he needs disambiguiting from Kennedy as they share everything but the last name, and this one's last name is not stated in the story. Amorkuz 06:12, December 23, 2016 (UTC)
On a second thought, maybe he should be John (1963)? Amorkuz 06:12, December 23, 2016 (UTC)
You seem to have forgotten to log in. Hmm, okay. Maybe it should be "John (1963)", I'm not sure. Now it's been explained to me, though, the current title makes a lot more sense.
× SOTO (//) 06:02, December 23, 2016 (UTC)
Yep, editing from a smartphone is not smart. Amorkuz 06:12, December 23, 2016 (UTC)
Ha! Nor an easy feat at all.    × SOTO (//) 06:16, December 23, 2016 (UTC)