Talk:P.S. (webcast): Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(→Canon) Tag: sourceedit |
Borisashton (talk | contribs) (→Invalid?: new section) Tag: sourceedit |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
: Check the archived discussion linked '''on this page''' or [[Forum:P.S.]]. Also, it is not up to individual users to decide what counts and what doesn't, so when an admin undoes your edit, don't change it back. We have a reason for not including it. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 19:49, March 10, 2016 (UTC) | : Check the archived discussion linked '''on this page''' or [[Forum:P.S.]]. Also, it is not up to individual users to decide what counts and what doesn't, so when an admin undoes your edit, don't change it back. We have a reason for not including it. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 19:49, March 10, 2016 (UTC) | ||
::having read the thread I'm still no clear on why this is not valid the argument that it was planned as live action but chenged to animation and is there for not valid is strange as nothing that gets published or brocast is as it was originally planned and the story still was made just in a different format if that means it's not valid then that means no version of shada is valid and non of the big finish lost story's can be valid ever also on the bit about shada the Tom baker links make sense in univers given that the curator exist | ::having read the thread I'm still no clear on why this is not valid the argument that it was planned as live action but chenged to animation and is there for not valid is strange as nothing that gets published or brocast is as it was originally planned and the story still was made just in a different format if that means it's not valid then that means no version of shada is valid and non of the big finish lost story's can be valid ever also on the bit about shada the Tom baker links make sense in univers given that the curator exist | ||
== Invalid? == | |||
The invalid tag for this page is not present. Is this a mistake? --[[User:Borisashton|Borisashton]] [[User talk:Borisashton|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 15:26, February 20, 2017 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:26, 20 February 2017
 |
Archives: #1 |
|---|
Canon
why is this not canon the statement at the top of the page that the fact the story was not produced semes wrong as it was made and released as story boreds with arther darvill– The preceding unsigned comment was added by 2.26.206.85 (talk).
- Check the archived discussion linked on this page or Forum:P.S.. Also, it is not up to individual users to decide what counts and what doesn't, so when an admin undoes your edit, don't change it back. We have a reason for not including it. Shambala108 ☎ 19:49, March 10, 2016 (UTC)
- having read the thread I'm still no clear on why this is not valid the argument that it was planned as live action but chenged to animation and is there for not valid is strange as nothing that gets published or brocast is as it was originally planned and the story still was made just in a different format if that means it's not valid then that means no version of shada is valid and non of the big finish lost story's can be valid ever also on the bit about shada the Tom baker links make sense in univers given that the curator exist
Invalid?
The invalid tag for this page is not present. Is this a mistake? --Borisashton ☎ 15:26, February 20, 2017 (UTC)
