Talk:Blitzen fish

Stub?

Can we remove the two 'Stubs' now? I filled in everything from Relative Dimensions regarding this species, so unless they appear elsewhere, it's probably time to remove them. Is anyone against me taking them off? Feel free to just do it haha. TheFartyDoctor ^Talk 21:53, March 20, 2017 (UTC)

In response to:

"Normally, I'd say you should remove stubs if you think the page is no longer a stub, but this page doesn't include much from the story where Susan bought the fish" -User:TheChampionOfTime

Well, I haven't heard AUDIO: Quinnis, so I can't make a statement on that. If she does literally what she says she does in Relative Dimensions, then what's so wrong in cheating this one time and simply changing "(AUDIO: Relative Dimensions) to (AUDIO: Quinnis, Relative Dimensions)? I wouldn't normally be naughty like this but if that's what she did then that's what she did haha. I'd really like someone who's heard it to validate that series of events because the article Quinnis (audio story) is revealing not much on the matter. TheFartyDoctor ^Talk 22:13, March 20, 2017 (UTC)

Quinnis is basically described in Relative Dimensions and I guess the article wouldn't be a stub if you "cheated". I'm just thinking that the article would be better with a few more details of the fish's life on Quinnis and the descriptions of it given in that story. CoT ? 22:27, March 20, 2017 (UTC)

Okay, in which case, fair is fair and we'll leave it as is. On retrospect, I'd rather hear Quinnis first. I'm a stickler for getting every bit of info, so it'd be hypocritical of me to bend/break my own rules here. TheFartyDoctor ^Talk 22:33, March 20, 2017 (UTC)