Category talk:Superweapons: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
OttselSpy25 (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tag: sourceedit |
OttselSpy25 (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tag: sourceedit |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
superweapons why isn't the warp star or the key to time on the superweapons page {{unsigned|Alexj98}} | superweapons why isn't the warp star or the key to time on the superweapons page {{unsigned|Alexj98}} | ||
:Well, in truth this whole category likely fails [[T:CAT NAMES|our rule to make sure that category names are unambiguous]]. There's no real definition of the word "superweapon" -- indeed, is it "superweapon" or "super weapon"? -- in the DWU. So, to my mind, the question is really, "Why does this category exist?" -- not "Why is <insert name here> not on the list?" {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}} 12:03: Fri 21 Apr 2017</span> | :Well, in truth this whole category likely fails [[T:CAT NAMES|our rule to make sure that category names are unambiguous]]. There's no real definition of the word "superweapon" -- indeed, is it "superweapon" or "super weapon"? -- in the DWU. So, to my mind, the question is really, "Why does this category exist?" -- not "Why is <insert name here> not on the list?" {{user:CzechOut/Sig}}{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}} 12:03: Fri 21 Apr 2017</span> | ||
:: I agree. "''Superweapon''" is just very odd and | :: I agree. "''Superweapon''" is just very odd and unspecific; it can mean everything and nothing. Surely it's not exactly a term universally used by all writers, and I doubt anyone has a very clear definition of what it means. [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]] ([[User Talk:OttselSpy25|Talk]]) 12:51, April 21, 2017 (UTC) | ||
:::Agreed. [[User:Shambala108|Shambala108]] [[User talk:Shambala108|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 13:37, April 21, 2017 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 17:03, 21 April 2017
superweapons why isn't the warp star or the key to time on the superweapons page – The preceding unsigned comment was added by Alexj98 (talk • contribs) .
- Well, in truth this whole category likely fails our rule to make sure that category names are unambiguous. There's no real definition of the word "superweapon" -- indeed, is it "superweapon" or "super weapon"? -- in the DWU. So, to my mind, the question is really, "Why does this category exist?" -- not "Why is <insert name here> not on the list?"
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ 12:03: Fri 21 Apr 2017- I agree. "Superweapon" is just very odd and unspecific; it can mean everything and nothing. Surely it's not exactly a term universally used by all writers, and I doubt anyone has a very clear definition of what it means. OS25 (Talk) 12:51, April 21, 2017 (UTC)
- Agreed. Shambala108 ☎ 13:37, April 21, 2017 (UTC)
- I agree. "Superweapon" is just very odd and unspecific; it can mean everything and nothing. Surely it's not exactly a term universally used by all writers, and I doubt anyone has a very clear definition of what it means. OS25 (Talk) 12:51, April 21, 2017 (UTC)
