Trusted
26,294
edits
(→Rename: I see no sea) Tag: sourceedit |
(→Rename) Tag: sourceedit |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:::::As I recall, the Doctor were merely nicknaming to refer to the size of it. --[[User:Danniesen|DCLM]] [[User talk:Danniesen|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 09:20, May 1, 2017 (UTC) | :::::As I recall, the Doctor were merely nicknaming to refer to the size of it. --[[User:Danniesen|DCLM]] [[User talk:Danniesen|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 09:20, May 1, 2017 (UTC) | ||
:::::: Just a thought: why is everyone calling it a ''sea'' creature or serpent etc.? It lived in a river for centuries and it is not clear (from one watching) that it's even terrestrial. Wouldn't it be safer to call it an ''aquatic'' creature/serpent/...? [[User:Amorkuz|Amorkuz]] [[User talk:Amorkuz|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 23:13, May 1, 2017 (UTC) | :::::: Just a thought: why is everyone calling it a ''sea'' creature or serpent etc.? It lived in a river for centuries and it is not clear (from one watching) that it's even terrestrial. Wouldn't it be safer to call it an ''aquatic'' creature/serpent/...? [[User:Amorkuz|Amorkuz]] [[User talk:Amorkuz|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 23:13, May 1, 2017 (UTC) | ||
::::::: Isn't it safer to go with a description that has been given? I mean, nowhere is it referred to as "aquatic creature/serpent". The Doctor gave a number of names, but they were obvious as nicknames. Sutcliffe said "creature", but that seems like a generic description that could be given to any living thing. I still say it should be [[Sea serpent (Thin Ice)]] as that was a description Moffat gave. --[[User:Danniesen|DCLM]] [[User talk:Danniesen|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 09:28, May 2, 2017 (UTC) |